> You can only know it's a media resource when you dereference it. > http://www.example.com/map#lat=-16.5&long=-151.7 is a valid Media > Fragment, NOT according to you. It is a valid URI fragment. >> So, I actually disagree with the notion that this is no a valid MF URI >> - it is a valid MF URI - it is just not a valid MF dimension. > > Needless to say that I disagree ;) I'm all for continuing the discussion, at least all the summer and then I wonder how should we move forward: Would a vote be useful? Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 14:29:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:39 GMT