W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Feedback from FOMS

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:03:21 +1100
Message-ID: <2c0e02831001281503l337d7a38p1319caee82e7a68b@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:53:28 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
> wrote:
>> OK, fair enough. I will try to not be distracted by the prose sections. If
>> possible we should mark them with (Informative), I went with "Note: this
>> section is non-normative" only because I couldn't figure out how to do
>> (Informative).
> I tried again and actually something like <inform-div1> adds (Non-Normative)
> to the title. The problem is that the section is numbered as an appendix (C)
> and doesn't appear in the TOC.

That may be overdoing it a bit, IMHO. :-)

Don't you think it will be obvious what will be informative and what
will be normative?

Received on Thursday, 28 January 2010 23:04:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:44 UTC