- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:08:57 +0100
- To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
- CC: Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
Dear Media Fragmenters,
Please, find below the agenda for this week telecon
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=20&month=01
year=2010&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
Actions opened:
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/open
Best regards.
Erik & Raphaël
------------
AGENDA Teleconference
W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2010-01-20
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, 20 January *10:00-11:00 UTC*
Local time:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=20&month=01&year=2010&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
20 January 2010, 1000 UTC
0200 (West US)
1000 (Galway)
1100 (Amsterdam, Sophia-Antipolis, Pretoria)
1900 (Tokyo)
2100 (Sydney)
Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99
Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152
Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG")
Duration : 60 minutes
-------------------------------------------------------------------
IRC channel : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665
W3C IRC Web Client : http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
Other clients are listed at http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/#Client
Zakim information : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
Zakim IRC bot : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Chair: Raphaël
ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList
Scribe: Guillaume (On Deck: Yves)
Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by
members and invited experts only.
1. ADMIN:
* Roll call
* PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 13 January 2009 telecon:
http://www.w3.org/2010/01/13-mediafrag-minutes.html
* Charter Extension:
** ACTION-127: Yves to look for the charter extension
* Next F2F Meeting:
** ACTION-128: Erik to poll Silvia, Conrad, Guillaume, and Michael
regarding the new proposed date for the next F2F
** See also:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jan/0017.html
** Results (missing Conrad, Silvia, Michael, Guillaume):
. Seoul (feb 23-25): 1 present (Erik) + 3 remotes (Davy, Raphael,
Phiilip) + 1 absent (Jack)
. Amsterdam (mar 8-9): 4 present (Erik, Davy, Jack, Raphael) + 1
remote (Philip)
* ACTION-92: Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers
** Target is MTAP SI on Semantic Multimedia,
http://www.samt2009.org/sites/default/files/mtap_cfp_flyer_v1.pdf, Erik
will circulate a draft version soon.
2. SPECIFICATION:
2.1 Media Fragment URI syntax: (Yves)
* Bug in the npt specification found by Philip:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0023.html
"I'd also like to point out that the ABNF for NPT does not match
RFC2326. It allows there to be 0 or more digits following the decimal
point, while the MF ABNF allows 1 or more digits."
* ACTION-126: Yves to follow up on error in ABFN for npt
2.2 UA Server HTTP Communication: (Conrad/Raphael)
* ACTION-123: Yves to come up with ABNF for header syntax
* ACTION-125: Michael to revisit his ednote in section 5
2.3 Media Fragment Processing:
* Question of MF URI validity by Philip:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0023.html
* Suggestion of nasty test cases by Philip:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0015.html
2.4 Discovery of 'Track' and 'Named' fragments:
* ISSUE-4 [Silvia]: Should we pre-define some track names?
* Davy's strawman implementation using ROE:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0014.html
* Silvia's blog post:
http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structure-of-a-composite-media-resource/
* Jack's proposal to write up that we should distinguish the mechanism
(ROE, MPEG-21) vs the semantics
2.5 Handling of 'Track' and 'ID':
Conrad's proposal (Fragment header):
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Server-parsed_Fragments
3. TEST CASES: (Michael)
* Corrib test tool: http://ld2sd.deri.org/corrib/ * ACTION-108: Michael
to add the missing test cases in corrib
* ACTION-115: Michael to come up with categorization of test cases wrt
empty, undefined, etc
* ACTION-118: Michael to come up with individual 'normal' test cases (+/-20)
* ACTION-119: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications
mailing list and notifications
4. IMPLEMENTATION:
* ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could
implement the logic on client side
* ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the logic
could be implemented on client side
* ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code
doing the parsing on client side of the media fragment
* ACTION-71: Michael to investigate whether he could have an
implementation in Javascript that does the client-side media fragments
parsing
5. ISSUES
5.1 Active:
None.
5.2 Non-Active:
* ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at
client-side
* ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding
* ISSUE-7 [Michael]: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing
* ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases?
* ISSUE-12 [Raphael]: What's the relationship between Images (CSS)
Sprites and the spatial dimension of the Media Fragments URI scheme?
* ISSUE-13 [Raphael]: Write a IETF draft for proposing how to register
the fragment scheme for all media types
6. AOB
--
Raphaël Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 09:09:36 UTC