W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > February 2010

Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 24 February, Telecon 1000 UTC

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:50:40 +0100
Message-ID: <4B8396E0.20101@w3.org>
To: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr
CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
regrets, MAWG F2F.

RaphaŽl Troncy wrote:
> Dear Media Fragmenters,
> 
> Please, find below the agenda for this week telecon 
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=24&month=02&year=2010&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 
> 
> Actions opened: 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/open
> 
> As usual, a lengthy agenda, but we will focus the discussion on:
>   - all the ACTIONS you would have _done_ ;-)
>   - the test cases for the temporal dimension and how we handle errors, 
> following last week discussion, proposal of TC by Silvia and entered in 
> the tool by Michael.
> Best regards.
> 
> Erik & RaphaŽl
> 
> ------------
> 
> AGENDA Teleconference
> W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2010-02-24
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Wednesday, 24 February *10:00-11:00 UTC*
> Local time:
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=24&month=02&year=2010&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 
> 
> 
> 24 February 2010, 1000 UTC
>               0200 (West US)
>               1000 (Galway)
>               1100 (Amsterdam, Sophia-Antipolis, Pretoria)
>               1900 (Tokyo)       
>               2100 (Sydney)       
> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
> Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99
> Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152
> Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG")
> Duration : 60 minutes
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> IRC channel          : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665
> W3C IRC Web Client   : http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
> Other clients are listed at http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/#Client
> Zakim information    : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
> Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
> Zakim IRC bot        : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Chair: Raphael, Erik
> ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList
> Scribe: Silvia (On Deck: Michael, Jack, Conrad)
> Regrets:
> 
> Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by
> members and invited experts only.
> 
> 1. ADMIN:
> * Roll call
> * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 17 February 2009 telecon:
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/17-mediafrag-minutes.html
> * Charter Extension:
> We need to update the new milestone expectations on the group's home 
> page, as described here: http://www.w3.org/Guide/Charter.html#extension
> * ACTION-92: Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers
> ** Target is MTAP SI on Semantic Multimedia, 
> http://www.samt2009.org/sites/default/files/mtap_cfp_flyer_v1.pdf, Erik 
> will circulate a draft version soon.
> 
> 2. F2F Meeting:
> * Draft Agenda: 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/FithF2FAgenda
> 
> 3. SPECIFICATION:
> 
> * ACTION-134: Erik to mark up the spec with normative and informative 
> classes [postpone?]
> * ACTION-144: Silvia to move the section 5.1.1 to the top
> * ACTION-143: Silvia to move 5.1.5 into a new section
> * ACTION-142: RaphaŽl to apply this change in the section 5.1.3 (jack's 
> note)
> 
> 3.1 Media Fragment URI syntax: (Yves)
> * Bug in the npt specification:
> Philip: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0023.html
> Dom: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jan/0093.html
> * Correct the NPT scheme (drop the 's') and point to 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime
> * Philip: drop the quotes also for the track and id dimension?
> * ACTION-126: Yves to follow up on error in ABFN for npt
> * ACTION-132: Philip to send to the mailing list a description of a new 
> issue to be discussed (dealing with decimal for specifying time?)
> 
> 3.2 Protocol for URI fragment Resolution in HTTP:
> * ACTION-123: Yves to come up with ABNF for header syntax
> 
> 3.3 Rendering of Media Fragments URI in UA:
> * ACTION-135: Davy, Erik to extend section 5 regarding spatial and track 
> dimension
> * ACTION-137: Jack to check that 5.1.4 is implementable using the protocol
> * ACTION-141: Conrad to add a paragraph in the section 5.2.1 that 
> further clarify the role of the UA for rendering a media fragment
> * ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at
> client-side
> 
> 3.4 Discovery of 'Track' and 'Named' fragments:
> * ISSUE-4 [Silvia]: Should we pre-define some track names?
> * Davy's strawman implementation using ROE:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0014.html
> * Silvia's blog post:
> http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structure-of-a-composite-media-resource/ 
> 
> * Jack's proposal to write up that we should distinguish the mechanism 
> (ROE, MPEG-21) vs the semantics
> 
> 3.5 Handling of 'Track' and 'ID':
> * Conrad's proposal (Fragment header):
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Server-parsed_Fragments
> * Franck revival:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Feb/0025.html
> 
> 4. TEST CASES: (Michael)
> * Corrib test tool: http://ld2sd.deri.org/corrib/
> * ACTION-108: Michael to add the missing test cases in corrib, see also 
> Silvia test cases at 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Feb/0019.html
> * ACTION-118: Michael to come up with individual 'normal' test cases 
> (+/-20)
> * ACTION-119: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications 
> mailing list and notifications
> * Suggestion of nasty test cases by Philip:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0015.html
> 
> 5. ISSUES
> 
> 5.1 Active:
> 
> 5.2 Non-Active:
> * ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding
> * ISSUE-7 [Michael]: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing
> * ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases?
> * ISSUE-12 [Raphael]: What's the relationship between Images (CSS) 
> Sprites and the spatial dimension of the Media Fragments URI scheme?
> * ISSUE-13 [Raphael]: Write a IETF draft for proposing how to register 
> the fragment scheme for all media types
> * ISSUE-14 [Davy]: How to deal with embedded time stamps
> 
> 6. IMPLEMENTATION:
> * ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could
> implement the logic on client side
> * ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the logic
> could be implemented on client side
> * ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code 
> doing the parsing on client side of the media fragment
> * ACTION-71: Michael to investigate whether he could have an 
> implementation in Javascript that does the client-side media fragments 
> parsing
> 
> 7. AOB
> 
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 08:51:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:38 GMT