W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > February 2010

Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 24 February, Telecon 1000 UTC

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:37:51 +0100
Message-ID: <4B8393DF.4030505@cwi.nl>
To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
CC: Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
Dear Media Fragmenters,

Please, find below the agenda for this week telecon 
Actions opened: 

As usual, a lengthy agenda, but we will focus the discussion on:
   - all the ACTIONS you would have _done_ ;-)
   - the test cases for the temporal dimension and how we handle errors, 
following last week discussion, proposal of TC by Silvia and entered in 
the tool by Michael.
Best regards.

Erik & RaphaŽl


AGENDA Teleconference
W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2010-02-24
Wednesday, 24 February *10:00-11:00 UTC*
Local time:

24 February 2010, 1000 UTC
               0200 (West US)
               1000 (Galway)
               1100 (Amsterdam, Sophia-Antipolis, Pretoria)
               1900 (Tokyo)		
               2100 (Sydney)		
Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
Bridge FR: +
Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152
Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG")
Duration : 60 minutes
IRC channel          : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665
W3C IRC Web Client   : http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
Other clients are listed at http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/#Client
Zakim information    : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
Zakim IRC bot        : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html

Chair: Raphael, Erik
ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList
Scribe: Silvia (On Deck: Michael, Jack, Conrad)

Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by
members and invited experts only.

* Roll call
* PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 17 February 2009 telecon:
* Charter Extension:
We need to update the new milestone expectations on the group's home 
page, as described here: http://www.w3.org/Guide/Charter.html#extension
* ACTION-92: Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers
** Target is MTAP SI on Semantic Multimedia, 
http://www.samt2009.org/sites/default/files/mtap_cfp_flyer_v1.pdf, Erik 
will circulate a draft version soon.

2. F2F Meeting:
* Draft Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/FithF2FAgenda


* ACTION-134: Erik to mark up the spec with normative and informative 
classes [postpone?]
* ACTION-144: Silvia to move the section 5.1.1 to the top
* ACTION-143: Silvia to move 5.1.5 into a new section
* ACTION-142: RaphaŽl to apply this change in the section 5.1.3 (jack's 

3.1 Media Fragment URI syntax: (Yves)
* Bug in the npt specification:
* Correct the NPT scheme (drop the 's') and point to 
* Philip: drop the quotes also for the track and id dimension?
* ACTION-126: Yves to follow up on error in ABFN for npt
* ACTION-132: Philip to send to the mailing list a description of a new 
issue to be discussed (dealing with decimal for specifying time?)

3.2 Protocol for URI fragment Resolution in HTTP:
* ACTION-123: Yves to come up with ABNF for header syntax

3.3 Rendering of Media Fragments URI in UA:
* ACTION-135: Davy, Erik to extend section 5 regarding spatial and track 
* ACTION-137: Jack to check that 5.1.4 is implementable using the protocol
* ACTION-141: Conrad to add a paragraph in the section 5.2.1 that 
further clarify the role of the UA for rendering a media fragment
* ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at

3.4 Discovery of 'Track' and 'Named' fragments:
* ISSUE-4 [Silvia]: Should we pre-define some track names?
* Davy's strawman implementation using ROE:
* Silvia's blog post:

* Jack's proposal to write up that we should distinguish the mechanism 
(ROE, MPEG-21) vs the semantics

3.5 Handling of 'Track' and 'ID':
* Conrad's proposal (Fragment header):
* Franck revival:

4. TEST CASES: (Michael)
* Corrib test tool: http://ld2sd.deri.org/corrib/
* ACTION-108: Michael to add the missing test cases in corrib, see also 
Silvia test cases at 
* ACTION-118: Michael to come up with individual 'normal' test cases (+/-20)
* ACTION-119: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications 
mailing list and notifications
* Suggestion of nasty test cases by Philip:


5.1 Active:

5.2 Non-Active:
* ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding
* ISSUE-7 [Michael]: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing
* ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases?
* ISSUE-12 [Raphael]: What's the relationship between Images (CSS) 
Sprites and the spatial dimension of the Media Fragments URI scheme?
* ISSUE-13 [Raphael]: Write a IETF draft for proposing how to register 
the fragment scheme for all media types
* ISSUE-14 [Davy]: How to deal with embedded time stamps

* ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could
implement the logic on client side
* ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the logic
could be implemented on client side
* ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code 
doing the parsing on client side of the media fragment
* ACTION-71: Michael to investigate whether he could have an 
implementation in Javascript that does the client-side media fragments 

7. AOB

RaphaŽl Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 08:38:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:44 UTC