W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > May 2009

RE: video annotation

From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 15:34:38 +0200
Message-ID: <14AE8514098875488F9FEACD90C747A227794A@gnvasmail1a.gva.ebu.ch>
To: Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>, <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Cc: <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
This refers to the proposal I made to media Fragment during the last F2F to
use edit units.




From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Joakim
Sent: mardi, 5. mai 2009 15:07
To: David Singer; public-media-fragment@w3.org
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: RE: video annotation


Hi, thanks!

I was concerned about how to refer to a temporal decomposition without
knowing FPS, "File Length" and other details.

Is there a standard agreement of what 20s-50s refers to? Perhaps the
"beginning" is not the same for all "expressions" of a work?






From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] 
Sent: den 1 maj 2009 18:40
To: Joakim Söderberg; public-media-fragment@w3.org
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: video annotation


At 16:00  +0200 28/04/09, Joakim Söderberg wrote:


	I wonder if it is possible to refer to a fragment of a video without
referring to an actual file?

yes, of course.


	For example if you want to annotate a scene in the Hollywood movie


You would need to identify the movie "Notting Hill" unambiguously, and I'd
say someone would need a URN scheme.


For example






	Co-Chair of Media Annotations group


	Joakim Söderberg, M.Sc, Ph.D Multimedia Indexing

	Senior Research Engineer, Media Protocols and Applications

	Ericsson Research, Multimedia Technologies




David Singer
Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2009 13:36:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:42 UTC