W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: FPWD published

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 23:06:11 +1000
Message-ID: <2c0e02830905020606g1c2363a0va097735033fdb8a4@mail.gmail.com>
To: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
2009/5/1 RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>:
> Dear all,
> Our FPWD has finally been published, and the link to pass around or blog
> about is now: http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags-reqs
> See also the press release: http://www.w3.org/News/2009#item64
> I had to modify the status section, since this document will not
> entirely become a recommendation. Some parts will become, while others
> will be included in a WG Note per resolution of our last F2F meeting.
> I have also corrected the various typos that Dave Singer provided me and
> added his major concerns as an editorial note.
> Finally, note that some of the links we have provided in the technology
> survey are now broken :-( I have fixed the wikipedia image link, but
> unfortunately, Google does not know neither that Cool URIs do not
> change! Consequently, the video.google.com url that shows that
> video.google.com has also fragment identifiers do not work anymore. The
> video actually has moved to YouTube, and thus the fragment syntax needs
> to be adapted :-( We can sort out that in the next iteration of the
> document ...

Seeing as video.google.com is now not hosting video any more, I would
suggest to remove the google section altogether. It may be around for
a bit longer, but not much, is my guess.

Any other broken links?

Received on Saturday, 2 May 2009 13:07:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:42 UTC