W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Should we create issues for things that came out of action-53?

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:36:28 +0200
Message-ID: <49D13B5C.7080406@cwi.nl>
To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Dear Jack,

> the thread that I started on timecodes and such seems to be going into 
> many different ways at once. There's various things I want to reply to, 
> but I'm a bit afraid that if I jump right in and reply to the various 
> issues there's a high chance that important issues will get buried in 
> discussion about other things that will turn out to be non-issues.
> 
> What is the best way to make sure that this doesn't happen? Should we 
> separate issues into new threads? Should we create issues in the 
> tracker? Or should we simply continue discussions as they're going right 
> now?

Good point! I'm trying to play my memory role and to keep track of all 
issues and write them down in the wiki. From your various threads, I 
have noted:
   1/ Minor issues in the current syntax that deserve some warning in 
our spec: we will discuss them in this week telecon;
   2/ Issue related to transcoding: is it allowed when cropping or not? 
Does ffmpeg produce only transcoded versions of a fragment? How ffmpeg 
does communicate the exact timeframe returned after the clipping 
operation (often different from the client request)? How the audio and 
video sync is guaranteed, see also http://wiki.xiph.org/OggSkeleton
   3/ Issue related to spatial cropping:
  . where that happens (client or server side)? 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Mar/0085.html
  . how to communicate the original size when using percentage values 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Mar/0061.html

My advice would be to create ISSUE in the tracker for 2/ and 3/. Jack, 
can you create them using [1]? An email with the issue text will be then 
automatically sent to the public mailing list by the tracker.
Thanks!
Best regards.

   RaphaŽl

[1] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/issues/new

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 21:37:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:32 GMT