W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Description of the 2-ways and the 4-ways handshake

From: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:09:47 +0100
Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A80E5216-9C1A-4565-81B0-51EA9E1763C8@cwi.nl>
To: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>

On 5 mrt 2009, at 14:44, RaphaŽl Troncy wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I have made my stab on the description of the 2-ways and the 4-ways  
> handshake proposal. See http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/HTTP_implementation
>
> All comments welcome! I asked some questions (regarding the first  
> HTTP response code in the 4-ways handshake). The pro/cons need also  
> to be completed. In particular, I'm not sure about the cachability  
> of the resource in both cases?


Raphael,
in the first example (2-way) you make the server return a different  
range than the client requested, and also the range returned was nice  
and ragged. With the second example, with all the nice numbers, could  
something similar be happening too? For a documentation point of view  
it might be a good idea to return those same ranges, unless there  
really is a difference.
--
Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack
If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma  
Goldman
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 15:10:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:32 GMT