On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Raphaël Troncy wrote: > Dear Conrad, > >> The distinction between use of a fragment or a query introduces >> different retrieval protocols. This is a technical distinction and has >> little to do with semantic purpose such as user context. > > Well, not exactly. The query creates a *new* resource that is unrelated to > the original resource, i.e., you can't tell that > http://www.example.org/myVideo.ogg?t=15,45 is unrelated to > http://www.example.org/myVideo.ogg. You don't have this problem with the > fragment. Plus, consider that a server returning the same content for both URIs above is a configuration choice, quite common now but perhaps not some time in the future (like when a security warning say that you have to reject every URI with query parameters on resources not handling them ;) ) So you can't even rely on a fallback mechanism to do discovery based on the structure of the URI. -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~YvesReceived on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 15:07:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 10 March 2009 15:07:20 GMT