W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > June 2009

Re: [Fwd: Last Call Announcement: DFXP 1.0]

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:04:19 +1000
Message-ID: <2c0e02830906262304x1b389405ne535c34e7e3277e5@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
I've reviewed the document on the plane to New York (to the Open Video
Conference) and am about to write a review blog post and a reply
email. I will give it as general feedback, not from our group.

I think DFXP satisfies all the requirements we could have as a group
toward a caption / timed text format, namely:
* providing a language descriptor for the file (-> lang attribute in tt element)
* providing means of directly accessing markers for time fragments (->
id attribute on timed text paragraphs)

The only thing maybe missing is to provide a track name for when the
DFXP file is included in a media file, but that is not as important
and can be done during the muxing-process (e.g. using skeleton in
Ogg).

Anything else I forgot to make sure is available?

Cheers,
Silvia.

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Jack Jansen<Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl> wrote:
> Folks,
> DFXP has gone to last call this week.
> And while we're not listed as one of the groups that might be interested in
> this I think we should be.
> Do other people share that view? Should we review this document for
> potential issues?
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Resent-From: symm@w3.org
> From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
> Date: 4 juni 2009 21:05:30 GMT+02:00
> To: SYMM <symm@w3.org>
> Subject: [Fwd: Last Call Announcement: DFXP 1.0]
>
> Resent-From: chairs@w3.org
> From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
> Date: 4 juni 2009 21:01:24 GMT+02:00
> To: "chairs@w3.org" <chairs@w3.org>
> Cc: "Dick.Bulterman" <Dick.Bulterman@cwi.nl>, Eric Hyche <ehyche@real.com>,
> janina@a11y.org, Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>, David Kirby
> <david.kirby@rd.bbc.co.uk>
> Subject: Last Call Announcement: DFXP 1.0
>
>
> Dear Chairs and Colleagues,
>
> The Timed Text WG has published a new Last Call document for DFXP 1.0 on
> June 2nd 2009:
>
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ttaf1-dfxp-20090602/
>
> Review end date: 30 June 2009
>
> We expect to request Proposed Recommendation status after that.
>
> Groups that have potential interest in reviewing the document:
> - SYMM WG
> - Protocols and Formats WG
>
> Groups who might have interest in the document:
> - SVG WG
> - HTML WG
> - CSS WG
>
> Comments must be sent to public-tt@w3.org .
>
> The Group made the decision to have a second Last Call on 29 May 2009
>
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2009May/0097.html
>
> This document is based on feedback from implementers. The list of
> changes made since the previous Candidate Recommendation is available in
> O.3 Changes from First Candidate Recommendation to this new (Third) Last
> Call Working Draft:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ttaf1-dfxp-20090602/#change-history-cr1-to-lc3
>
> A test suite is available, along with its coverage report and a
> preliminary implementation report:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/10/dfxp-testsuite.zip
> http://www.w3.org/2008/10/dfxp-test-coverage.html
> http://www.w3.org/2009/05/dfxp-results.html
>
> No patent disclosures have been made for DFXP 1.0.
>
> Regards,
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack
>
> If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 27 June 2009 06:05:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:33 GMT