Hi Silvia, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : >> but it >> seems to me that the important questions are more technical: is this scheme >> good or not, is it too complex to implement or not, should it be profiled or >> not, extended or not ... > > I agree, that is the key question. So, are you aware of any MPEG > implementations that have implemented the fragment addressing schemes? No. > If not, that seems to me to be an indication of it being too complex. I wouldn't jump to that conclusion. There may be other reasons. > Also, it gives us an opportunity to test the scheme that we are > developing within the MPEG communities and potentially develop a more > usable scheme that can be supported by everyone. > > Do you have more information to share on the uptake and use of the > MPEG URI fragment addressing schemes? No. Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images /Dept. Signal and Image Processing Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://tsi.enst.fr/~concolatReceived on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 07:41:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:34 GMT