W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > August 2009

Re: ACTION-76 : Question if MPEG-21 Part 17 got registered on IANA as a media mime type for fragments

From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:41:28 +0200
Message-ID: <4A94E728.4020804@enst.fr>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Silvia,

Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit :
>> but it
>> seems to me that the important questions are more technical: is this scheme
>> good or not, is it too complex to implement or not, should it be profiled or
>> not, extended or not ...
> I agree, that is the key question. So, are you aware of any MPEG
> implementations that have implemented the fragment addressing schemes?

> If not, that seems to me to be an indication of it being too complex.
I wouldn't jump to that conclusion. There may be other reasons. 

> Also, it gives us an opportunity to test the scheme that we are
> developing within the MPEG communities and potentially develop a more
> usable scheme that can be supported by everyone.
> Do you have more information to share on the uptake and use of the
> MPEG URI fragment addressing schemes?

Cyril Concolato
Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor
Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group
Département Traitement du Signal et Images
/Dept. Signal and Image Processing
Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications
46 rue Barrault
75 013 Paris, France
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 07:41:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:43 UTC