- From: erik mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:36:24 +0200
- To: <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <00b401ca1a77$f49fe370$dddfaa50$@mannens@ugent.be>
Dear Media Fragmenters,
 
 
Please, find below the agenda for tomorrow’s telecon.
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=12&month=08&year=20
09&hour=12&min=00&sec=0&p1=0.
 
 
Best regards.
 
 
Raphaël & Erik
 
------------
 
AGENDA Teleconference
W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2009-08-12
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, 12 August *12:00-13:00 UTC*
Local time:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=12&month=08&year=20
09&hour=12&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
 
 
12 August 2009, 1200 UTC
              0500 (West US)
              1300 (Galway)
              1400 (Amsterdam, Paris, Pretoria)
              2100 (Tokyo)
              2200 (Sydney)
Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99
Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152
Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG")
Duration : 60 minutes
-------------------------------------------------------------------
IRC channel          : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665
W3C IRC Web Client   : http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
Other clients are listed at http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/#Client
Zakim information    : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
Zakim IRC bot        : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Chair: Raphael/Erik
ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList
Scribe: Conrad, Erik
Regrets: most probably Yves
 
Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by
members and invited experts only.
 
 
1. ADMIN:
* Roll call
* PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 15 & 22 July 2009 telecon:
http://www.w3.org/2009/07/15-mediafrag-minutes.html
http://www.w3.org/2009/07/22-mediafrag-minutes.html
* ACTION-92:  <http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/92>
Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers (ongoing … re-raise
around 15/09/09)
 
 
2. UC & REQUIREMENTS:
* ACTION-68: Raphael to ask the Media Annotations WG to review our document
* ACTION-74: Erik, Raphael, and Yves to request feedback of other groups
such
as SYMM, SVG, HTML + WHATWG, WAI, MAWG, TAG, MobileWeb, TimedText (ongoing …
re-raise around 15/09/09)
* To be discussed: Live Streaming UC (see Mail Silvia …
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Jul/0028.html)
 
 
3. SPECIFICATION:
 
3.1 Syntax: (Yves)
* ACTION-49: Yves to Draft the HTTP-Range syntax for different units
(completing all the syntax for the two way handshake) (ongoing … re-raise
around 15/08/09, after IETF Meeting)
* ACTION-93: Michael to revisit the TC and see which are affected by the
temporal-optional-comma-decision
 
3.2 UA Server HTTP Communication (Conrad/Raphael)
* ACTION-69: Conrad to draw a representation of the general structure of
a media resource, for streamable formats (ongoing … re-raise around
01/09/09, when having had full discussion)
 
 
4. TEST CASES: (Michael)
* See: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/TestCases
** review some more TC’s
 
 
5. ISSUES
* ISSUE-3 [Michael]: Does our MF URI syntax imply that we need to update
MIME Type registrations?
** ACTION-89: Yves to find out more about fragment identifier registration
(ongoing … re-raise around 15/08/09, after IETF Meeting)
 
* ISSUE-4 [Silvia] :
<http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/issues/4> Should we
pre-define some track names?
 
* ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at
client-side
 
* ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding
** ACTION-62: Yves to ask the TAG whether transcoding should be
forbidden or not when we send a fragment of a resource
 
* ISSUE-7 [Michael]:
<http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/issues/7> User Agent
Media Fragment Resolution and Processing
** ACTION-64: Michael to write into the WD section 6.4, what the client
should do with #everything after the hash : "Client Side Media Fragment
Resolution"
 
* ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases?
** ACTION-82: Michael to flesh out TC vocabulary re ISSUE-9
 
* ISSUE-10 [Michael] :
<http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/issues/10> Media
Fragments Test Case Maintenance 
 
 
6. IMPLEMENTATION:
* ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could
implement the logic on client side
* ACTION-91: Guillaume to look at the python gst lib
* ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the
logic could be implemented on client side
* ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code
doing the parsing on client side of the media fragment
* ACTION-71: Michael to investigate whether he could have an
implementation in Javascript that does the client-side media fragments
parsing
* ACTION-90: Davy to provide a pointer to Yves to a lib he can use to slice
media files
 
 
7. AOB
 
  _____  
http://www.ibbt.be/en/disclaimer
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 11:37:12 UTC