W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Review of section 7

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:10:48 +1000
Message-ID: <2c0e02830904140610u2c6920a0wd768e09fda5eadbd@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Cc: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>
>> Then I think the User Agent should be encouraged (or even required) to
>> only send the byte ranges, since they can be resolved without a
>> further mapping effort on the server side.
>
> Why? let's remove POST, as it requires processing on the server side :)

After having read some of your replies, I think you're actually
talking about a server sending two range replies, rather than a User
Agent sending two range requests. I don't have an issue with that, as
long as they don't contradict each other. If they contradict, I don't
think a User Agent can clearly decide which is the truthful one and
may need to assume that the server gave a broken reply...

Cheers,
Silvia.
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 13:11:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:33 GMT