Dear all, I would like to start a discussion on this topic that could further precises the scope of a media URI fragment specification. I would distinguish the identification versus the description of a media URI fragment. The identification refers to the syntax with which we construct a fragment URI. The description refers to the semantics of this fragment. Silvia proposed in the Media Annotation UC [1] the possibility to label a fragment (e.g. the kiss scene) for being able to refer to. Is this label still an identification of the fragment or a description? Do we consider that describing a media fragment is out of scope of this WG? Raphaël [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Use_Cases_%26_Requirements -- Raphaël Troncy CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093 Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 21:28:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 7 October 2008 01:08:00 GMT