W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > October 2008

Re: URI comparison (was Re: minutes of 2008-10-08 telecon)

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:01:37 -0400 (EDT)
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
cc: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810150758460.20032@ubzre.j3.bet>

On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:

>>> Finally, you said that http://example.com/what#date=1234/test (is it a
>>> valid URI?) is not different than http://example.com/what#date=5678/test ?
>>> Because they point to the same resource?
>> In that case, the resource is the same http://example.com/what, you are just
>> addressing different fragments of the same resource, and not two different
>> resources, like in the first two examples.
> Because the # is not valid anywhere beyond the user agent - certainly
> web proxies and origin servers are supposed to drop them if they ever
> get there.

At the addressing level, they exists, but it's just that fragments are 
not sent in HTTP requests.

Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2008 12:01:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:41 UTC