Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise

On 2014-04-02 13:48, Dan Burnett wrote:
>
> On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:06 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
>
>> Thanks a lot for working out this proposal!
>>
>> I like it.
>>
>> Just for confirmation: getCapabilities, getConstraints and
>> getSettings would work as today (no changes compared to the Ed's
>> draft)?
>
> getCapabilities and getSettings should be unchanged.  I'll have to
> think about getConstraints, but off the top of my head it will either
> be able to remain the same or it will return this new structure.

It should probably return the new structure.

Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2014 12:24:09 UTC