public-media-capture@w3.org from April 2014 by author

Adam Bergkvist

• Re: [Bug 25360] New: MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Wednesday, 16 April)

Ami Fischman

• Re: status of authorization process for getMediaDevices (Monday, 7 April)
• status of authorization process for getMediaDevices (Wednesday, 2 April)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 22354] Security and Privacy Considerations section needed (Monday, 28 April)
• [Bug 24931] the spec defines an interface called “MediaError”, which conflicts with the “MediaError” defined for the MediaElement (video/audio tags) (Friday, 25 April)
• [Bug 25441] Overconstrained muted state should not link with MediaStreamTrack.readyState (Friday, 25 April)
• [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted. (Friday, 25 April)
• [Bug 25441] Overconstrained muted state should not link with MediaStreamTrack.readyState (Friday, 25 April)
• [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted. (Friday, 25 April)
• [Bug 22354] Security and Privacy Considerations section needed (Friday, 25 April)
• [Bug 25441] New: Overconstrained muted state should not link with MediaStreamTrack.readyState (Thursday, 24 April)
• [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted. (Thursday, 24 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Thursday, 24 April)
• [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted. (Wednesday, 23 April)
• [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted. (Tuesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 22365] The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe. (Tuesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 23928] Define Error basic information "as used in these specs". (Tuesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 22263] Clarify synchronization of tracks in a MediaStream (Tuesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 22354] Security and Privacy Considerations section needed (Tuesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Tuesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Tuesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Thursday, 17 April)
• [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Thursday, 17 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Thursday, 17 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• [Bug 25360] MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• [Bug 25360] MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• [Bug 25360] MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• [Bug 25360] MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• [Bug 25360] MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Wednesday, 16 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• [Bug 25361] New: Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• [Bug 25360] New: MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Monday, 14 April)
• [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Friday, 11 April)
• [Bug 25276] Initialization for VideoTrack.selected attribute is missing while specifying steps for "Loading and Playing a MediaStream in a Media Element" (Friday, 11 April)
• [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25276] Initialization for VideoTrack.selected attribute is missing while specifying steps for "Loading and Playing a MediaStream in a Media Element" (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25262] MediaStream Constructor algorithm must also check for MediaStreamTracks "ended" state while initializing "active" state. (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25250] Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track. (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25250] Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track. (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25248] MediaStreamTrack.stop() should fire ended event. (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25249] Source should be detached when a MediaStreamTrack stops for any reason other than stop (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25249] Source should be detached when a MediaStreamTrack stops for any reason other than stop (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25298] New: How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices (Wednesday, 9 April)
• [Bug 25248] MediaStreamTrack.stop() should fire ended event. (Tuesday, 8 April)
• [Bug 25248] MediaStreamTrack.stop() should fire ended event. (Tuesday, 8 April)
• [Bug 25248] MediaStreamTrack.stop() should fire ended event. (Tuesday, 8 April)
• [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices (Monday, 7 April)
• [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices (Monday, 7 April)
• [Bug 25276] New: Initialization for VideoTrack.selected attribute is missing while specifying steps for "Loading and Playing a MediaStream in a Media Element" (Saturday, 5 April)
• [Bug 25275] New: VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Saturday, 5 April)
• [Bug 25262] New: MediaStream Constructor algorithm must also check for MediaStreamTracks "ended" state while initializing "active" state. (Friday, 4 April)
• [Bug 23928] Define Error basic information "as used in these specs". (Friday, 4 April)
• [Bug 25250] Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track. (Friday, 4 April)
• [Bug 25250] Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track. (Friday, 4 April)
• [Bug 24928] the spec defines the addtrack event as part of the MediaStream interface, but never calls out when the event should be fired. (Friday, 4 April)
• [Bug 25250] Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track. (Friday, 4 April)
• [Bug 25250] Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track. (Friday, 4 April)
• [Bug 25250] New: Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track. (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 25249] New: Source should be detached when a MediaStreamTrack stops for any reason other than stop (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 25248] MediaStreamTrack.stop() should fire ended event. (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 25248] New: MediaStreamTrack.stop() should fire ended event. (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22365] The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe. (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22365] The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe. (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22217] What happens if mediastream source becomes unavailable during the consent prompt? (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22260] Give guidance on defining MediaStream consumers (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22273] "When track constraints change" should be better described, referred from applyConstraints (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 25230] readyState attribute must be inherited while cloning a MediaStreamTrack (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22260] Give guidance on defining MediaStream consumers (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 25247] New: getCapabilities needs to decide what scope(s) it's available at (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22217] What happens if mediastream source becomes unavailable during the consent prompt? (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry" (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 25226] Retriving track using getTrackById in Examples is not proper. (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 23817] [Nit] Redundant TOC headers 8.1 & 9.1 (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 23817] [Nit] Redundant TOC headers 8.1 & 9.1 (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 23824] Extraneous constraint structure described in prose...(please remove) (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 25245] New: Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices (Thursday, 3 April)
• [Bug 25230] New: readyState attribute must be inherited while cloning a MediaStreamTrack (Wednesday, 2 April)
• [Bug 25226] New: Retriving track using getTrackById in Examples is not proper. (Wednesday, 2 April)
• [Bug 22366] Consider making stream URLs generated in an iframe, playable by the parent page. (Tuesday, 1 April)
• [Bug 22222] Impossible to bind manually created MediaStream to getUserMedia (Tuesday, 1 April)

cowwoc

• Re: gUM and persistent permissions (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: Screen sharing (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Screen sharing (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Screen sharing (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Screen sharing (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Permission dialog across pages, domains (Friday, 18 April)
• Permission dialog across pages, domains (Friday, 18 April)

Cullen Jennings

• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)

Cullen Jennings (fluffy)

• Re: Screen sharing (Sunday, 27 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Sunday, 27 April)
• Re: echoCancelation (sic) (Wednesday, 2 April)

Dan Burnett

• Re: Ideal? (was Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise) (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)
• WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: gUM and persistent permissions (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Thursday, 3 April)

Harald Alvestrand

• Re: gUM and persistent permissions (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Monday, 28 April)
• Some code: Constraint transformations (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: Screen sharing (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted. (Friday, 25 April)
• Screen sharing - document structure (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: Screen sharing (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted. (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Security considerations section - a proposal (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Security considerations section - a proposal (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Security considerations section - a proposal (Wednesday, 23 April)
• use of bugzilla comments vs the list (Re: [Bug 25298] How to represent...) (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: status of authorization process for getMediaDevices (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: echoCancelation (sic) (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: Ideal? (was Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise) (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: echoCancelation (sic) (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)

Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

• Re: [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera. (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [Bug 25247] New: getCapabilities needs to decide what scope(s) it's available at (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: [Bug 22593] Capabilities are buggy (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: Can constraints constrain by default? (Thursday, 3 April)
• Can constraints constrain by default? (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Ideal? (was Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise) (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)

Jim Barnett

• Re: gUM and persistent permissions (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: Can constraints constrain by default? (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: Can constraints constrain by default? (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)

Justin Uberti

• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Permission dialog across pages, domains (Friday, 18 April)

Kiran Kumar Guduru

• Re: Re: [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted. (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Re: [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted. (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Re: Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Tuesday, 15 April)

Martin Thomson

• Re: gUM and persistent permissions (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: gUM and persistent permissions (Monday, 28 April)
• gUM and persistent permissions (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: Screen sharing (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: Screen sharing - document structure (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: Screen sharing (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: Screen sharing (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Screen sharing (Thursday, 24 April)
• Screen sharing (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Security considerations section - a proposal (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Permission dialog across pages, domains (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Permission dialog across pages, domains (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: [Bug 25250] New: Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track. (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: [Bug 25245] Specify "access" in the context of getMediaDevices (Thursday, 3 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)

Randell Jesup

• Re: echoCancelation (sic) (Thursday, 3 April)

Steev James

• Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Thursday, 3 April)

Stefan Håkansson LK

• RE: [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted. (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: [Bug 25361] Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted. (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Security considerations section - a proposal (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Saturday, 19 April)
• Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [Bug 25361] New: Media Capture and Streams spec should explicitly specify that recvonly streams / tracks should be considered as muted. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [Bug 25360] New: MediaStreamTrack should not be considered as ended just because remote peer stopped sending data. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [Bug 25275] VideoTrackList.selectedIndex initialization confilicts with HTML5 spec, "if no track is selected". (Monday, 14 April)
• Incorporate "WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise" in Editor's draft (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: [Bug 25250] Ended track should not be added to MediaStream, when addTrack() is invoked for and ended track. (Friday, 4 April)
• Fwd: Joint Interim meeting May 19-21, 2014 (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: Ideal? (was Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise) (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: WebIDL-compatible syntax compromise (Wednesday, 2 April)

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 April 2014 16:45:02 UTC