- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:40:29 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2013-10-28 07:50, Adam Bergkvist wrote: > On 2013-10-27 22:02, Martin Thomson wrote: >> On 26 October 2013 15:25, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >>> I would actually prefer an error callback or an exception - the >>> programmer made an error, the application should do something >>> exceptional. >> >> The problem is that this ISN'T an error, it's just part of the normal >> business of writing the app. >> >> I WANT to have the stream added and negotiated, because - failing some >> sort of circumstances out of my control - I expect the user to grant >> permission really soon now. And I want to ensure that, when they do, >> the session can actually proceed. > > Is this one intended use-case of "no-access" tracks? I thought we had > constructable tracks (without initial source) for this. "without initial source" is perhaps not the best wording. If a sourceId was provided, it should be more like "without granted source". /Adam
Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 07:40:54 UTC