- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:03:11 +0200
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 2013-06-17 14:01, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > On 06/17/2013 12:53 PM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: >> On 2013-06-17 12:25, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >>>> [1] >>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2012Mar/0085.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> was this the wrong link? This link points to Dom's request to abandon >>> the two-callbacks pattern. >> >> Yes. Wrong link. This is the correct one. >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2012Mar/0024.html >> >> > > Thanks! > > Anant's argument seems logical - that the infobar/doorhanger method of > applying for permission is confusing when it comes to embedded content. Yes, this issue is closely related to UI. > Would it make sense to say that GetUserMedia from an iframe can only > work if an existing permission is active for that origin? (either a > stored permission or a permission granted in the current session > (whatever a session is))? I think it makes sense for some cases, but it's makes it tricky for an iframe to acquire permissions. I still think an option for the main page to allow the iframe to use getUserMedia() gives us more. /Adam
Received on Monday, 17 June 2013 14:03:41 UTC