W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > April 2013

Re: addTrack/removeTrack on gUM streams and PeerConnection remote streams

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:15:08 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLaCmcHHjGceO+4NbmteeuduGqv7cZTdBe-t_MOnPYyc5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
Cc: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Adam Bergkvist <
adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com> wrote:

> The model to let an application-managed MediaStream (BundleMediaStream)
> inherit from MediaStream is simple but gives us, IMO, a lot. The only
> drawback I can see is that the event handlers, used to listen to how the UA
> adds and removes tracks, are available on BundleMediaStream as well. We
> could add a new common base type to get around that, but I don't think it's
> a deal breaker.
>

I'm confused. What's the problem with the event handlers? They would remain
on MediaStream.

Rob
-- 
q“qIqfq qyqoquq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq
qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq
qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqeqmq.q qAqnqdq qiqfq qyqoquq
qdqoq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qaqrqeq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qyqoquq,q
qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq
qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qdqoq qtqhqaqtq.q"
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 10:15:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:24:40 UTC