W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > April 2013

Re: Edit new proposal for device enumeration into draft

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:45:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUeH4Z5Mfn=fCfgs9hv_As0RLsMCGj01YTz8tvaXe5HPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Let's get this crystal clear.  The substance of the change is to:

a) provide a structure in place of an identifier, where the structure
includes id, label, kind, and facing attributes

b) provide access only to the id and kind attributes prior to
obtaining any form of user consent

c) provide access to id, kind AND label attributes (not facing) once
permissions for ANY source is granted

Your intent here is not to discuss Harald's suggested change to user
interface, but the above.  Is that correct?

On 16 April 2013 05:27, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK
<stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> All (speaking as chair),
> Harald recently proposed an alternative approach for device enumeration [1]
> that exposes a bit more info to the application than what is in the current
> Editor's draft [2].
> The feedback basically ranged from "I like this" to "I want even more info
> exposed".
> The next reasonable step, with that feedback in mind, seems to be to
> incorporate the proposal in the Editor's draft so that it can be reviewed in
> the right context. We can then discuss further e.g. if more data should be
> exposed.
> So I ask the Editor's to do that when appropriate.
> Stefan
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2013Mar/0050.html
> [2] http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/getusermedia.html
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 16:46:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:24:40 UTC