W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > June 2012

Fwd: Re: Spec question: Using settings dictionaries instead of MediaConstraints

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:11:52 +0200
Message-ID: <4FE2F368.3020807@alvestrand.no>
To: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Forwarding to Media Capture Task Force list, since this goes into the 
getUserMedia specification....

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Spec question: Using settings dictionaries instead of 
MediaConstraints
Resent-Date: 	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:41:34 +0000
Resent-From: 	public-webrtc@w3.org
Date: 	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:40:59 +0200
From: 	Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
To: 	Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
CC: 	public-webrtc@w3.org <public-webrtc@w3.org>


...


This makes me think of the addStream() case and constraints. At the last 
media capture TF meeting we talked about a way to avoid introducing 
multi-track support in constraints by allowing multiple getUserMedia() 
calls in the same event loop iteration to share the same UI (and only 
bug the user once). But problem is back again if we consider: 
pc.addStream(multipleAudioTracksStream, constraints);

  /Adam
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 10:12:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:24:35 UTC