W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Thoughts on converging MediaStream and Stream objects

From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:11:32 +0100
Message-ID: <1323335492.11343.257.camel@altostratustier>
To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Le mercredi 07 décembre 2011 à 18:22 +0000, Travis Leithead a écrit :
> So my conclusions are that:
> 1. MediaStreams and Streams are sufficiently different that they should not attempt to be "combined" logically.
> 2. Streams serve as an excellent output format from a MediaStream recorder (rather than a Blob).

To the risk of starting a bikeshedding discussion, is there a way to
find a different name for one or the other of the two interfaces, if
they can't be linked by an inheritance logic? It's very likely to cause
a lot of confusion if Stream and MediaStream aren't actually strongly
related.

Would MediaSource work for instance? MediaConduit? MediaChannel?

Or maybe Stream should be StreamedBlob?

Dom
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 09:11:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:14:58 GMT