- From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:31:00 +0000
- To: Rich Tibbett <richt@opera.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
>Would there be any issues with moving 'Section 3: Stream API' from the >WebRTC API spec to the Media Capture API spec? * I also support this request. >We should also try early on to converge [2], [4] and [5]. Anyone want to >get the ball rolling on that in a separate thread? I have some thoughts about Stream vs. MediaStream and I'll send them as a separate thread. I don't know much about DataStream yet, so I'll need to read-up on that. >* I'm proposing that we rename of the 'getusermedia' document to 'Media >Capture API' unless there are any objections. Looks like the old DAP spec address [6] already redirects to getusermedia. Sounds like a good idea for search term consistency :) >[2] http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html#stream-api >[4] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webapps/raw-file/tip/StreamAPI/Overview.htm >[5] >https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=16csYCaHxIYP83DzCZJL7relQm2QNxT- >qkay4-jLxoKA&pli=1 [6] http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/camera/Overview-API
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 18:31:43 UTC