W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > March 2012

RE: Schema.org mapping table

From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:11:34 +0200
To: Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>
CC: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, "mcsuarez@fi.upm.es" <mcsuarez@fi.upm.es>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7D1656F54141C042A1B2556AE5237D6001162EF4F080@GVAMAIL.gva.ebu.ch>
Hello Daniel,

The updated table was attached to my mail. Thierry should pblish it as a reference for review and discussion.

Best regards,

Jean-Pierre

________________________________________
From: Daniel Park [soohongp@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 March 2012 00:32
To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
Cc: tmichel@w3.org; mcsuarez@fi.upm.es; public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: Schema.org mapping table

JP,

It seems we need a discussion and consensus on that mapping.
therefore, please complete the initial version of this mapping, and I
will see members opinion and agreement on that mapping accordingly.

Thanks, Daniel.

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch> wrote:
> Dear Thierry,
>
> Please find a revised version of the mapping table for schema.org.
>
> Mari-Carmen sent me her comments but I must admit that I can't agree with most :--( e.g.
>
> - encodingFormat should map to relation and not to compression or the equivalent of a wrapper as I originally suggested
> - or add contentRating to rating when the schema.org semantics clearly point to parentalGuidance mapping
> - or TVSeries or TVSeason are not collections
> - or only map contributor (and not actor, producer, etc.)
> - Etc.
>
> Putting all these comments in the table would make it very messy.
>
> I therefore proposed to Mari-Carmen that she forwards her comments to the group for review in a webex, one by one. However, she reminded me of populating the mapping accuracy column as well as the datatypes, which I have now done.
>
> This gave me the opportunity to review the table and I have identified missing mappings. I have also removed the CreativeWork root in the expressions as ma-ont obviously describe a media content equivalent to a CreativeWork.  Several contributors roles are repeated in different schema.org branches like in Movie or MusicRecording or TVEpisode or even TVSeries and TVSeason.
>
> The revised table is attached and still need to be review against the comments from Mari-Carmen.
>
> Sorry I couldn't do more on Mari-Carmen comments but I have invited her to share these comments with the group and I am looking for the opportunity to discuss them one by one in the group.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jean-Pierre
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: mardi, 27. mars 2012 14:09
> To: mcsuarez@fi.upm.es
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Schema.org mapping table
>
> Mari-Carmen,
>
> Jean Pierre has provided an initial schema.org mapping table to
> complement our Ontology spec.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/additional-mappings.html
>
> As you had volunteer to collaborate to this work, could you please look
> at it and finalize it ?
>
>
> Best,
>
> Thierry
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
> **************************************************



--
Soohong Daniel Park
Samsung Electronics, SWC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 06:13:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 March 2012 06:13:08 GMT