W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Schema.org mapping table

From: Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:32:02 +0900
Message-ID: <CAHSr+v1rom=cVjugzZyc3w2Nwra=-ZRHAnWyLhVtCS41GYkUBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>
Cc: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, "mcsuarez@fi.upm.es" <mcsuarez@fi.upm.es>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
JP,

It seems we need a discussion and consensus on that mapping.
therefore, please complete the initial version of this mapping, and I
will see members opinion and agreement on that mapping accordingly.

Thanks, Daniel.

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch> wrote:
> Dear Thierry,
>
> Please find a revised version of the mapping table for schema.org.
>
> Mari-Carmen sent me her comments but I must admit that I can't agree with most :--( e.g.
>
> - encodingFormat should map to relation and not to compression or the equivalent of a wrapper as I originally suggested
> - or add contentRating to rating when the schema.org semantics clearly point to parentalGuidance mapping
> - or TVSeries or TVSeason are not collections
> - or only map contributor (and not actor, producer, etc.)
> - Etc.
>
> Putting all these comments in the table would make it very messy.
>
> I therefore proposed to Mari-Carmen that she forwards her comments to the group for review in a webex, one by one. However, she reminded me of populating the mapping accuracy column as well as the datatypes, which I have now done.
>
> This gave me the opportunity to review the table and I have identified missing mappings. I have also removed the CreativeWork root in the expressions as ma-ont obviously describe a media content equivalent to a CreativeWork.  Several contributors roles are repeated in different schema.org branches like in Movie or MusicRecording or TVEpisode or even TVSeries and TVSeason.
>
> The revised table is attached and still need to be review against the comments from Mari-Carmen.
>
> Sorry I couldn't do more on Mari-Carmen comments but I have invited her to share these comments with the group and I am looking for the opportunity to discuss them one by one in the group.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jean-Pierre
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: mardi, 27. mars 2012 14:09
> To: mcsuarez@fi.upm.es
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Schema.org mapping table
>
> Mari-Carmen,
>
> Jean Pierre has provided an initial schema.org mapping table to
> complement our Ontology spec.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/additional-mappings.html
>
> As you had volunteer to collaborate to this work, could you please look
> at it and finalize it ?
>
>
> Best,
>
> Thierry
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
> **************************************************



-- 
Soohong Daniel Park
Samsung Electronics, SWC
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 22:32:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 28 March 2012 22:32:33 GMT