W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > January 2012

Re: XMP example and XMP JSON response files don't seem to be in sync.

From: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:04:16 +0100
Cc: "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>, "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5D8EFB18-354D-4C49-B4BE-5250CCCCE789@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Hi Felix, all!

In that case, Thierry should use the file as it was ;)

Cheers.
_____________________________
Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
Chair of Distributed Information Systems
University of Passau
Innstr. 43
94032 Passau

Room 248 ITZ

Tel.: +49 851 509 3063
Fax: +49 851 509 3062

stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de
https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/
http://twitter.com/fstegmai
_____________________________

Am 31.01.2012 um 13:02 schrieb Felix Sasaki:

> This was an error in the XSLT that generates the RDF from the original XMP. I have fixed this now, see
> 
> http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/
> http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-xslt.rdf
> 
> Florian, I guess you when need to regenerate the JSON from above RDF.
>  
> Felix
> 
> 2012/1/31 Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
> For some reason, the additional identifiers from the original XMP files were dropped in the RDF rather than having multiple identifiers, there is a comment instead <!--xmp:Identifier--> in the RDF.
> 
> Best regards,
> Werner
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Florian Stegmaier [mailto:stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de]
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Jänner 2012 12:27
> > An: tmichel@w3.org
> > Cc: Felix Sasaki; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> > Betreff: Re: XMP example and XMP JSON response files don't seem to be in
> > sync.
> >
> > Hi Thierry,
> >
> > yes, i have already told you that this is is a relict before our decision to use
> > the RDF data set as basis. Please use the attached version of the JSON
> > instead. In any case, the information of the RDF shall be reflected in the
> > JSON.
> >
> > Are there also difficulties because of *-a/*-b test cases?
> >
> > Cheers.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Felix Sasaki
> DFKI / W3C Fellow
> 
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 12:04:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 31 January 2012 12:04:48 GMT