W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > January 2012

AW: XMP example and XMP JSON response files don't seem to be in sync.

From: Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:30:26 +0100
To: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>, "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>
CC: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD9846F872C7874BB4E0FDF2A61EF09FDB1B55056C@RZJC1EX.jr1.local>
For some reason, the additional identifiers from the original XMP files were dropped in the RDF rather than having multiple identifiers, there is a comment instead <!--xmp:Identifier--> in the RDF.

Best regards,
Werner

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Florian Stegmaier [mailto:stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Jänner 2012 12:27
> An: tmichel@w3.org
> Cc: Felix Sasaki; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Betreff: Re: XMP example and XMP JSON response files don't seem to be in
> sync.
> 
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> yes, i have already told you that this is is a relict before our decision to use
> the RDF data set as basis. Please use the attached version of the JSON
> instead. In any case, the information of the RDF shall be reflected in the
> JSON.
> 
> Are there also difficulties because of *-a/*-b test cases?
> 
> Cheers.
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 11:30:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 31 January 2012 11:30:55 GMT