W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > January 2012

RE: Issues in youtube ontology example

From: Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:29:05 +0900
To: tmichel@w3.org
Cc: '"'Höffernig, Martin'"' <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>, public-media-annotation@w3.org
Message-id: <020f01cccf37$3e07ef00$ba17cd00$%lee@samsung.com>
Hi. Thierry.
Sure. I will send the updated files to you until Wednesday(11th Jan.).

Best regards,
Wonsuk.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 1:30 AM
> To: Wonsuk Lee
> Cc: "'Höffernig, Martin'"; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Issues in youtube ontology example
> 
> Wonsuk,
> 
> Could you send the updated files ?
> 
> Best,
> 
> Thierry
> 
> Le 04/01/2012 03:26, Wonsuk Lee a écrit :
> > Hi. Martin.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for good comments.
> >
> > For the ma:hasCompression and ma:hasFormat, I will revise the youtube
> > ontology example as below.
> >
> >
> >
> > <ma:hasCompression rdf:parseType="Resource">
> >
> > <rdfs:label
> > rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">application/x-
> shockwa
> > ve-flash</rdfs:label>
> >
> > </ma:hasCompression>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <ma:hasFormat rdf:parseType="Resource">
> >
> > <rdfs:label>  application/x-shockwave-flash</rdfs:label>
> >
> > </ma:hasFormat>
> >
> >
> >
> > In addition, your comments are also valuable to other examples I take
> care
> > such as MediaRSS [1] and TXF [2] examples.
> >
> > Therefore, if you are ok for upper proposal, I will apply these style to
> > three examples.
> >
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/mrss_s
> am
> > ple_rdf.rdf
> >
> > [2]
> >
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/txfeed
> -s
> > ample_rdf.rdf
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Wonsuk.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Höffernig, Martin [mailto:Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 8:20 PM
> > To: Wonsuk Lee; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> > Subject: Issues in youtube ontology example
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Wonsuk,
> >
> >
> >
> > While looking at the MA ontology examples, I recognized some issues in
> your
> > youtube [1] example:
> >
> > The value of ma:hasCompression is a string. Since ma:hasCompression is
> an
> > ObjectProperty, a literal cannot be its value, instead a resource is
> > expected. Therefore I propose to insert a blank node with the value of
> > compression as label.
> >
> > Furthermore, ma:format is not part of the MA spec and should be changed
> to
> > ma:hasFormat.
> >
> >
> >
> > Can you please address these issues?!
> >
> >
> >
> > [1]:
> >
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/Youtub
> e-
> > new-example_rdf.rdf
> >
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> >
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2012 01:29:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 10 January 2012 01:29:37 GMT