W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Issues in youtube ontology example

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:29:34 +0100
Message-ID: <4F07216E.9070701@w3.org>
To: Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com>
CC: "'Höffernig, Martin'" <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>, public-media-annotation@w3.org
Wonsuk,

Could you send the updated files ?

Best,

Thierry

Le 04/01/2012 03:26, Wonsuk Lee a écrit :
> Hi. Martin.
>
> Thanks a lot for good comments.
>
> For the ma:hasCompression and ma:hasFormat, I will revise the youtube
> ontology example as below.
>
>
>
> <ma:hasCompression rdf:parseType="Resource">
>
> <rdfs:label
> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">application/x-shockwa
> ve-flash</rdfs:label>
>
> </ma:hasCompression>
>
>
>
>
>
> <ma:hasFormat rdf:parseType="Resource">
>
> <rdfs:label>  application/x-shockwave-flash</rdfs:label>
>
> </ma:hasFormat>
>
>
>
> In addition, your comments are also valuable to other examples I take care
> such as MediaRSS [1] and TXF [2] examples.
>
> Therefore, if you are ok for upper proposal, I will apply these style to
> three examples.
>
>
>
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/mrss_sam
> ple_rdf.rdf
>
> [2]
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/txfeed-s
> ample_rdf.rdf
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wonsuk.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Höffernig, Martin [mailto:Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 8:20 PM
> To: Wonsuk Lee; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Issues in youtube ontology example
>
>
>
> Dear Wonsuk,
>
>
>
> While looking at the MA ontology examples, I recognized some issues in your
> youtube [1] example:
>
> The value of ma:hasCompression is a string. Since ma:hasCompression is an
> ObjectProperty, a literal cannot be its value, instead a resource is
> expected. Therefore I propose to insert a blank node with the value of
> compression as label.
>
> Furthermore, ma:format is not part of the MA spec and should be changed to
> ma:hasFormat.
>
>
>
> Can you please address these issues?!
>
>
>
> [1]:
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/Youtube-
> new-example_rdf.rdf
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Martin
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 6 January 2012 16:29:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 January 2012 16:29:59 GMT