W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > October 2011

Re: follow up on the HTTP status codes for API spec to CR.

From: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:20:50 +0200
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Message-Id: <F28A23C4-516A-4FFF-8565-D8039B593561@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
To: tmichel@w3.org
Hi Thierry,

ok, i will update the table and Ack section! Status etc is not possible for me to set in the DEV space.

Best.
_____________________________
Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
Chair of Distributed Information Systems
University of Passau
Innstr. 43
94032 Passau

Room 248 ITZ

Tel.: +49 851 509 3063
Fax: +49 851 509 3062

stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de
https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/
http://twitter.com/fstegmai
_____________________________

Am 19.10.2011 um 10:19 schrieb Thierry MICHEL:

> 
> And also the Note is not updated
> 
> Later versions of this document may include additional status codes or other changes.
> 
> change to
> 
> Later versions of this document may include additional status codes.
> 
> Thierry
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Later versions of this document may include additional status codes or other changes.
> 
> Le 19/10/2011 10:14, Thierry MICHEL a écrit :
>> OOps, here is the diff file ...
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2008%2FWebVideo%2FAnnotations%2Fdrafts%2FAPI10%2FCR%2FOverview.html&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2F2008%2Fvideo%2Fmediaann%2Fmediaont-api-1.0%2Fmediaont-api-1.0.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Looking more into your edits
>> 
>> You have not updated the following lines in the table
>> 
>> 400 Bad Request syntactical error with respect to the GET method used
>> 
>> change to
>> 
>> 400 Bad Request syntactical error
>> 
>> 562 Property not supported only a subset of GET methods for properties
>> implemented
>> 
>> change to
>> 
>> 562 Property not supported a subset of properties implemented
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thierry.
>> 
>> Le 19/10/2011 09:59, Thierry MICHEL a écrit :
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le 19/10/2011 08:30, Florian Stegmaier a écrit :
>>>> Hi Thierry!
>>>> 
>>>> I have reflected your edits regarding the API section into the DEV
>>>> space:
>>>> 
>>>> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-1.0.html#api-status-codes
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Are there any further edits to do?
>>> 
>>> I had updates the Acknowledgements
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/CR/Overview.html#acknowledgements
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> And Status of this document section.
>>> And This, latest and previous versions. .
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I have run a diff of the two version
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/CR/Overview.html
>>> 
>>> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-1.0.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The diif analysis seems wrong:
>>> Curiously it reports diffs that are not different in the two documents
>>> ;-((
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> Florian
>>>> _____________________________
>>>> Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
>>>> Chair of Distributed Information Systems
>>>> University of Passau
>>>> Innstr. 43
>>>> 94032 Passau
>>>> 
>>>> Room 248 ITZ
>>>> 
>>>> Tel.: +49 851 509 3063
>>>> Fax: +49 851 509 3062
>>>> 
>>>> stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de
>>>> https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/
>>>> http://twitter.com/fstegmai
>>>> _____________________________
>>>> 
>>>> Am 18.10.2011 um 14:26 schrieb Thierry MICHEL:
>>>> 
>>>>> Yves,
>>>>> 
>>>>> We have discussed this issue during the MAWG telecon.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> These status code are not on the HTTP level, but on a layer on top of
>>>>> it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As these are on different layers, we have decided to remove the
>>>>> wording and references to HTTP to avoid any confusion.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Therefore the "4.7 API Status Codes" section
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/CR/Overview.html#api-status-codes
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The section does not mentions HTTP nor refers to it.
>>>>> The intro paragraph now says:
>>>>> 
>>>>> [This section introduces a set of status codes for the defined API to
>>>>> indicate the system behavior. As described in section 4.4, the status
>>>>> code is returned as one of the attributes of the MediaAnnotation
>>>>> object returned by a method call to the API. These status codes are
>>>>> used on the API level, and applied to either client side or server
>>>>> side implementations.]
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you see a coincidence between the Numerical Code and the HTTP
>>>>> staus code, it is only a coincidence ;-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I hope that this resolution fits your comment. Let us know.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thierry.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Le 18/10/2011 11:37, Yves Lafon a écrit :
>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Thierry MICHEL wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yves,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We are still stuck with this HTTP status codes issue, blocking the
>>>>>>> API
>>>>>>> spec moving to CR.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Following your last comment
>>>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Oct/0042.html
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Werner has responded to it on Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:22:34
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Oct/0043.html
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Could you please give us a response has we need your approval on a
>>>>>>> resolution to move forward.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Well, errors and successful responses are all tunnelled in HTTP
>>>>>> 200, so
>>>>>> basically you are partially reinventing SOAP (well, not even, SOAP 1.1
>>>>>> used HTTP 500 for SOAP faults), if the group wants to keeps thing as
>>>>>> is,
>>>>>> at least confusion should be cleared about fault codes mimicking HTTP
>>>>>> but being used in an antithetic way to HTTP.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We have a Media Annotation WG telecon today at 13h00 (French time).
>>>>>>> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 6294 ("MAWG")
>>>>>>> IRC channel: #mediaann
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Could you please join this telecon to come to a resolution?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> No, sorry.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best, Thierry.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 08:21:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 19 October 2011 08:21:22 GMT