Re: [Reminder] editors of the Metadata examples to send their files

I've taken the examples of others and created the attached RDF file.
Things didn't seem fully consistent in other example files, so I did
what I thought was right.

If this is what you are after, I will create the same type of
information for WebM.

Cheers,
Silvia.


On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
<silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> I am actually struggling with the requirement of writing an RDF. The
> formats that we are looking at here are binary formats with fields in
> a bitstream providing the information that we are after. Even if I
> come up with an RDF, there will never be a file that you can can parse
> or create with an RDF file. Do you really need to see a RDF file? Or
> what is the intention of providing the RDF file?
>
>
> The information that you can use in Ogg is available from the following links:
>
> https://wiki.xiph.org/Ogg_Skeleton
> -> says that the following fields are compulsory
> Content-type: mime type as per
> http://wiki.xiph.org/MIME_Types_and_File_Extensions#Codec_MIME_types
> Role: track role as per http://wiki.xiph.org/SkeletonHeaders#Role
> Name: a unique free text string
>
> https://wiki.xiph.org/SkeletonHeaders
> -> list other useful message headers for skeleton
>
> http://xiph.org/vorbis/doc/v-comment.html
> https://wiki.xiph.org/Vorbiscomment
> -> list the meta data available in vorbiscomment headers
>
>
> Now for the attached Ogg file. It has been created with ffmpeg2theora
> and the following metadata:
>
> skeleton of video track:
> Content-Type: video/theora
> Role: video/main
> Name: video_1
>
> skeleton of audio track:
> Content-Type: audio/vorbis
> Role: audio/main
> Name: audio_1
>
> vorbiscomment of both, video and audio track:
> TITLE=W3C and Twitte
> DATE=2009-10-08
> LOCATION=Sydney
> ORGANIZATION=Web Directions South
> COPYRIGHT=CC-BY-SA
> CONTACT=silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com
>
> If this kind of information is sufficient, I will try to get you the
> same for WebM.
>
> Cheers,
> Silvia.
>
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>> Silvia,
>>
>> You may want to check the files already provided.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Format_mapping_review
>>
>> Thierry.
>>
>> Le 04/05/2011 12:09, Silvia Pfeiffer a �crit :
>>>
>>> Are there example files to do these?
>>> Silvia.
>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 04/05/2011, at 7:05 PM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org> �wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> This is a reminder for the editors of the Metadata examples to send their
>>>> files (XML and RDF).
>>>>
>>>> We are now close to move the Media Ontology document to Candidate Rec
>>>> (CR)
>>>> In order to exit CR, we must deliver a set of testcases for each format.
>>>> So far we have a fair amount of files.
>>>>
>>>> But we are still missing the following:
>>>>
>>>> QuickTime � � Courtney
>>>> 3GP � � � � � � Courtney
>>>> MP4 � � � � � � Courtney
>>>>
>>>> XMP � � � � � � Felix
>>>>
>>>> EBUCore � � Jean-Pierre
>>>>
>>>> MediaRDF Vocabulary Tobias
>>>> LOM v1484-12-1 � � � �Tobias
>>>> METS v1.7 � � � �Tobias
>>>>
>>>> OGG � � � � � � Sylvia
>>>> WEBM � � � � � � Silvia
>>>>
>>>> Dublin Core � �Thierry
>>>> Flash � � � � � �Thierry
>>>>
>>>> SMPTE RP210-11 � � Werner
>>>> TTML � � � � � � Werner
>>>>
>>>> Media RSS v1.1.2 Wonsuk
>>>> TXFeed v0.9 � � Wonsuk
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Deadline for sending these file was set to end of May 2011.
>>>>
>>>> Per W3C process, all format missing these files will have to be removed
>>>> from the Media Ontology specification in order to allow moving forward to
>>>> PR.
>>>> Therefore please send your files ASAP.
>>>>
>>>> Thierry
>>
>