W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2011

Re: change proposal in the ontology and API document (ACTION-412)

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 10:24:17 +0200
Message-ID: <4DC501B1.4040908@w3.org>
To: tmichel@w3.org
CC: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>, Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>


The CR version of the Ontology is now at
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediaont-1.0.html


Please review.

TM.

Le 07/05/2011 09:55, Thierry MICHEL a écrit :
>
> Pierre Antoine, Florian,
>
> I have updated the Ontology spec with your edits following.
> Florian can you please update the API spec ?
>
>
>
>
>
> Change to section 4.4: Double
>
> Change title from "Double" to "Decimal"
> --> Done
>
> A Decimal value SHOULD be represented using the XML Schema decimal data
> type, but MAY be represented using the XML Schema double data type if
> decimal is not available.
>
> --> Done
>
> Other changes related to Double/Decimal
>
> All occurence of "double" or "Double" up to section 5.1 (included) can
> be replaced by "decimal" or "Decimal" respectively. All furhter
> occurences should be kept as is (they refer to the IEEE double dataype).
>
> --> Done
>
>
>
> Change to section 4.5: Date
>
> A Date value MUST be represented using one of the specific date/time
> data types of XML Schema, depending on the available precision: gYear
> gYearMonth, date, dateTime, or dateTimeStamp.
> Change to 7.2 Correspondence between the informal ontology and the RDF
> representation
>
> --> Done
>
> (...)
> date.date (value of ma:date) (6)
>
> --> Done
>
> #correspondance-id6
>
> (6) According to Section 4.4, several datatypes are allowed here.
> However, if compliance with a specific OWL 2 Profile is required,
> additional constraints on the allowed datatypes may apply [OWL2 Profiles].
>
> --> Done
> Addition to Appendix B References (Non-Normative)
>
> #owl2-profiles
>
> [OWL2 Profiles]
> OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Profiles. W3C OWL Working Group. Available
> for download at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/ .
>
> --> Done
>
> I have also included you new owl version "R32d"
> from 2011-04-06
>
> Finally I have added a new section with the Ontology in TTL
>
> Let me know if all these changes are OK.
>
>
>
> Le 04/05/2011 17:51, Pierre-Antoine Champin a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as per my ACTION-412, here attached is a list of changes in the ontology
>> and API documents implementating my two proposals:
>>
>> 1/
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Apr/0026.html
>>
>>
>> Basically I replaced "must use dateTime" by "must use one of gYear,
>> gYearMonth, date, dateTime, dateTimeStamp" (in both the Ontology and API
>> document) with a warning in the RDF section about OWL2 compliance.
>>
>>
>> 2/
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Apr/0034.html
>>
>>
>> That one didn't receive any feedback, so I'm assuming nobody is against
>> it :) Basically, I replaced "must use double" by "should use decimal,
>> but may use double", which lets the API use 'double' (as WebIDL does not
>> have decimal) but lets RDF use the more general 'decimal' datatype for
>> the sake of OWL2 profile compliance.
>>
>>
>> Also, I attach a new version of the RDF ontology with
>> * some bugs removed
>> * those changes implemented
>> * a cleaner look
>> and a Turtle version of that ontology.
>>
>> I would suggest that both files would be *linked* from the Ontology
>> document (Turtle being marked as non-normative) rather than the ugly
>> verbatim inclusion of the RDF/XML...
>>
>> regards
>>
>> pa
>
Received on Saturday, 7 May 2011 08:24:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 7 May 2011 08:24:38 GMT