W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2011

Re: change proposal in the ontology and API document (ACTION-412)

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 09:55:40 +0200
Message-ID: <4DC4FAFC.2080104@w3.org>
To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>, Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>

Pierre Antoine, Florian,

I have updated the Ontology spec with your edits following.
Florian can you please update the API spec ?





Change to section 4.4: Double

Change title from "Double" to "Decimal"
--> Done

A Decimal value SHOULD be represented using the XML Schema decimal data 
type, but MAY be represented using the XML Schema double data type if 
decimal is not available.

--> Done

Other changes related to Double/Decimal

All occurence of "double" or "Double" up to section 5.1 (included) can 
be replaced by "decimal" or "Decimal" respectively. All furhter 
occurences should be kept as is (they refer to the IEEE double dataype).

--> Done



Change to section 4.5: Date

A Date value MUST be represented using one of the specific date/time 
data types of XML Schema, depending on the available precision: gYear 
gYearMonth, date, dateTime, or dateTimeStamp.
Change to 7.2 Correspondence between the informal ontology and the RDF 
representation

--> Done

(...)
date.date 	(value of ma:date) (6)

--> Done

#correspondance-id6

(6) According to Section 4.4, several datatypes are allowed here. 
However, if compliance with a specific OWL 2 Profile is required, 
additional constraints on the allowed datatypes may apply [OWL2 Profiles].

--> Done
Addition to Appendix B References (Non-Normative)

#owl2-profiles

[OWL2 Profiles]
     OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Profiles. W3C OWL Working Group. 
Available for download at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/ .

--> Done

I have also included you new owl version "R32d"
from 2011-04-06

Finally I have added a new section with the Ontology in TTL

Let me know if all these changes are OK.



Le 04/05/2011 17:51, Pierre-Antoine Champin a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> as per my ACTION-412, here attached is a list of changes in the ontology
> and API documents implementating my two proposals:
>
> 1/
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Apr/0026.html
>
> Basically I replaced "must use dateTime" by "must use one of gYear,
> gYearMonth, date, dateTime, dateTimeStamp" (in both the Ontology and API
> document) with a warning in the RDF section about OWL2 compliance.
>
>
> 2/
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Apr/0034.html
>
> That one didn't receive any feedback, so I'm assuming nobody is against
> it :) Basically, I replaced "must use double" by "should use decimal,
> but may use double", which lets the API use 'double' (as WebIDL does not
> have decimal) but lets RDF use the more general 'decimal' datatype for
> the sake of OWL2 profile compliance.
>
>
> Also, I attach a new version of the RDF ontology with
> * some bugs removed
> * those changes implemented
> * a cleaner look
> and a Turtle version of that ontology.
>
> I would suggest that both files would be *linked* from the Ontology
> document (Turtle being marked as non-normative) rather than the ugly
> verbatim inclusion of the RDF/XML...
>
>   regards
>
>    pa
Received on Saturday, 7 May 2011 07:56:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 7 May 2011 07:56:01 GMT