W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Metadata formats examples must be valid

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:07:39 +0200
Message-ID: <4DFA0E2B.9010300@w3.org>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Silvia,

Sorry I indeed forgot to add the references in my earlier email, but I 
am sure you know about the W3C validator ;-)



[1] http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/

[2] http://validator.w3.org/


Please run your files against these validator, it will inform what needs 
to be updated if necessary.

I rather not make these changes myself, and prefer the editors to work 
on their files.

Best,

Thierry



Le 16/06/2011 03:16, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit :
> Thierry,
>
> You didn't provide your links for [1] and [2]. And you didn't list the
> documents that are invalid.
>
> Can you please provide additional information so we know what has to be changed?
>
> Alternatively, it's of course completely ok for you to make those
> changes yourself in the spirit of keeping the various contributions in
> sync.
>
> Cheers,
> Silvia.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org>  wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thank you for your imput for the Testsuite for the Ontology for Media
>> Resources 1.0
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html
>>
>> I have been looking at the metadata formats examples associated with the
>> associated RDF/OWL file for correspondence with the core properties.
>>
>> Here are my remarks:
>>
>> 1- For some examples, the XML file does not validate against the XML
>> validation (well formed document)[1].
>> -->  XML documents MUST be well formed.
>>
>> 2- Most of the RDF files do not validate against the RDF validator [2]
>> -->  RDF documents MUST be valid
>>
>> 3- For some RDF file the URL of the corresponding example file are wrong:
>> <rdf:Description rdf:about= ....
>> or
>> xml:base="...
>> etc.
>>
>> -->  Please make sure the corresponding URL are right.
>>
>>
>> Please review your contribution and make sure the 3 above requirements are
>> fulfilled.
>>
>> We will be looking at these files during the next MAWG F2F in ERCIM/Sophia.
>> Therefore please provide valid documents before this event 28/29 june.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Thierry.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 14:07:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:42 UTC