W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Metadata formats examples must be valid

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:20:32 +1000
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=az=n0j7y5azrr2495ufC+DsP7HA@mail.gmail.com>
To: tmichel@w3.org
Cc: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Hi Thierry,

attached validating rdf files on [1].

Cheers,
Silvia.


On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
> Silvia,
>
> Sorry I indeed forgot to add the references in my earlier email, but I am
> sure you know about the W3C validator ;-)
>
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/
>
> [2] http://validator.w3.org/
>
>
> Please run your files against these validator, it will inform what needs to
> be updated if necessary.
>
> I rather not make these changes myself, and prefer the editors to work on
> their files.
>
> Best,
>
> Thierry
>
>
>
> Le 16/06/2011 03:16, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit :
>>
>> Thierry,
>>
>> You didn't provide your links for [1] and [2]. And you didn't list the
>> documents that are invalid.
>>
>> Can you please provide additional information so we know what has to be
>> changed?
>>
>> Alternatively, it's of course completely ok for you to make those
>> changes yourself in the spirit of keeping the various contributions in
>> sync.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Silvia.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your imput for the Testsuite for the Ontology for Media
>>> Resources 1.0
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html
>>>
>>> I have been looking at the metadata formats examples associated with the
>>> associated RDF/OWL file for correspondence with the core properties.
>>>
>>> Here are my remarks:
>>>
>>> 1- For some examples, the XML file does not validate against the XML
>>> validation (well formed document)[1].
>>> -->  XML documents MUST be well formed.
>>>
>>> 2- Most of the RDF files do not validate against the RDF validator [2]
>>> -->  RDF documents MUST be valid
>>>
>>> 3- For some RDF file the URL of the corresponding example file are wrong:
>>> <rdf:Description rdf:about= ....
>>> or
>>> xml:base="...
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> -->  Please make sure the corresponding URL are right.
>>>
>>>
>>> Please review your contribution and make sure the 3 above requirements
>>> are
>>> fulfilled.
>>>
>>> We will be looking at these files during the next MAWG F2F in
>>> ERCIM/Sophia.
>>> Therefore please provide valid documents before this event 28/29 june.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Thierry.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 03:21:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:42 UTC