W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > July 2011

RE: RE : RE : multimedia metadata formats examples satus and update

From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:32:56 +0200
To: "'tmichel@w3.org'" <tmichel@w3.org>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7D1656F54141C042A1B2556AE5237D60010F5A273946@GVAMAIL.gva.ebu.ch>
Thierry,

The xmls haven't been changed but I added the UTF-8 declaration and the comments on authorship in the owl files. They validate on the Manchester OWL validator.

You can mark them as compliant with the guidelines on the test suite page. I still have to edit the HTML pages.

Jean-Pierre

 



-----Original Message-----
From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] 
Sent: mardi, 19. juillet 2011 08:28
To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: RE : RE : multimedia metadata formats examples satus and update

Jean Pierre,

Be marked as so:
"RDF Files marked in [green] are done as it pass the editors guidelines)".
see
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html

Let me know if your files do conform to these guidelines and I will mark 
them as done.
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/Guidelines_for_ontology_examples.html

We will have a review latter on to check these files before going to PR.


If you have write access just edit the HTML page and save it in place
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mappings_tested/EBUCore.htm

If you don't, just save the HTML file locally, edit it and send it back 
to me in an attachment. I will upload it.

Best,

Thierry.

Le 18/07/2011 18:32, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
> What do you mean by be marked as so?
>
> How can I edit the page?
>
> ________________________________________
> De : Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
> Date d'envoi : lundi, 18. juillet 2011 10:48
> À : Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Cc : public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Objet : Re: RE : multimedia metadata formats examples satus and update
>
> Jean-Pierre,
>
> Thanks for your files. It is now published.
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html
>
> Are these conformant to the guidelines ?
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/Guideline
> and be marked as so ?
>
> Also one last bit,  could you please update the "Tested" column in the
> Mapping table for your format linked from
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mappings_tested/
>
>
> and you will be done.
>
> Best,
>
> Thierry
>
> Le 17/07/2011 12:57, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
>> Dear Michel,
>>
>> I have already sent the EBUCore.
>>
>> The extended TVA XML and RDF files are attached and have been validated by the Manchester OWL validator.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jean-Pierre
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> De : public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] de la part de Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
>> Date d'envoi : vendredi, 8. juillet 2011 14:47
>> À : public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Objet : multimedia metadata formats examples satus and update
>>
>> Dear RDF editors,
>>
>> Thank you for your work to provide multimedia metadata formats examples
>> associated with RDF files. These are collected in our testsuite [1].
>>
>> During our last F2F WG meeting, we have checked these files. Currently
>> a large number are either missing information, invalid, missing
>> properties, etc.
>>
>> Please refer to the minutes of the F2F meeting, were each files has
>> been scanned.
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/06/28-mediaann-minutes.html
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/06/29-mediaann-minutes.html
>>
>> As we must provide valid and complete RDF files to exit CR, we have
>> written guidelines in order to achieve this goal.
>> Please follow the 3 procedures from the guidelines:
>>          1- RDF Example editing and validation
>>          2- Examples  validation with the Media Ontology
>>          3- Mapping table update
>>
>> As described in the guidelines [2].
>>
>>
>> The deadline for providing final RDF files is 7th of August. Make sure
>> your files fulfill the guidelines.
>>
>> All formats not fulfilling the guidelines will have to be removed from
>> the ontology spec in order to allow the spec to enter PR.
>>
>> We are now very near the end of REC track. This work will be your last
>> contribution allowing  to exit CR and enter PR. Your input is really
>> critical.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite
>> .html
>>
>>
>> [2]
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/Guideline
>> s_for_ontology_examples.html
>>
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------
>> **************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it
>> are confidential and intended solely for the
>> use of the individual or entity to whom they
>> are addressed.
>> If you have received this email in error,
>> please notify the system manager.
>> This footnote also confirms that this email
>> message has been swept by the mailgateway
>> **************************************************


Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 19:46:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 19:46:11 GMT