W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > January 2011

RE: Editors with Action Items

From: 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:15:20 +0900
Message-ID: <B4EAD1122C31304099A5CDEA5447210F023A28A3@email2>
To: <tmichel@w3.org>
Cc: Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, "Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>, "Chris.Poppe@UGent.be" <Chris.Poppe@ugent.be>, <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Hi. Thierry.

Regarding to your comment, I have done this via your guide of another email.
Please take a look at [1]. Is it OK?

[1] http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html



Best regards,
Wonsuk.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:59 PM
> To: Joakim Söderberg; Daniel Park; Chris.Poppe@UGent.be; 이원석; public-
> media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Editors with Action Items
> 
> 
> Hi joakim, Daniel, Chris,  Wonsuk,
> 
> Here are some remaining ACTIONS for you in order to have the Ontology to
> move to CR.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> WONSUK
> 
> 
> -- LC Comment -2418: NO - partially implemented
> Fininsh the style sheet issue.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> JOAKIM
> 
> -- LC Comment -2405: NO - partially implemented:1.1 Purpose of this
> specification
> (Action to Joakim to add a paragraph)
> make the set of classes and properties the Ontology defines and the
> values. and provide an implementation of the vocabulary in RDF.
> --> Joakim, Is this done ?
> 
> 
> The abstract and introduction should mention the definition of the RDF
> ontology and the mapping table that will come with it.
> --> The abstract and introduction sdoes not mention the definition of
> the RDF ontology
> 
> 
> -- LC Comment -2418: NO - partially implemented (Edits are missing)
> ed19.:
> -----
> In general it would be helpful if you could be clearer about what the
> normative statements apply to. What is it that MUST do this or that? Is
> it an abstract usage of an ontology? A concrete implementation?
> Something else?
> -->ACTION Joakim: Is this now more clear ?
> 
> 
> DANIEL
> -- LC Comment -2418: NO - partially implemented
> 
> * substantial17:
> ----------------
> → the example of a geocoordinateis is *not added*
> Resolutuon was: [About ""it MAY also define a coordinate system that can
> be used to interpret these measurements" Is there a controlled
> vocabulary for these? ", we will give an example of a geocoordinate that
> can be used in this case and rephrase the sentence to avoid the
> confusion about "interpreting the measurements" in the next version of
> the document.]
> --> ACTION is for Daniel to write to the Geolocation WG for a suggestion.
> 
> 
> 
> CHRIS
> 
> -- LC Comment -2394 : NO - partially implemented :  text is still at
> beginning of section 3.1.
> ACTION: Chris to implement issue from lc 2394 regarding HTML5 -
> HTMLMediaElement implements MediaResource
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 13:16:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 19 January 2011 13:16:26 GMT