W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > January 2011

Re: section RDF (annule et remplace ENCORE)

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:26:50 +0100
Message-ID: <4D36BC6A.8070709@w3.org>
To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>


Le 19/01/2011 11:09, Pierre-Antoine Champin a écrit :
> Looks good to me. A few comments:
>
> * is it necessary that section 7 *and* subsections 7.2 and 7.3 be marked
> as normative?

You are right I have removed normative for subsections 7.2 and 7.3

see

http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#ont-RDF
>
> * the POWDER example in section 6 is (or should be, I think) related to
> the RDF ontology in section 7; shouldn't both sections be swapped?

It could. the issue is that section 7 is normative and section 6 
examples there are informative.


>
> pa
>
>
> On 01/19/2011 10:27 AM, Thierry MICHEL wrote:
>>
>> Pierre Antoine,
>>
>> i have added your
>> input in section 7
>>
>> see
>> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#ont-RDF
>>
>>
>> Let me know if it is OK.
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 14/01/2011 22:02, Pierre-Antoine Champin a écrit :
>>> ben non, il en restait une :-(
>>>
>>> a+
>>>
>>> pa
>>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 10:27:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 19 January 2011 10:28:37 GMT