Re: section RDF (annule et remplace ENCORE)

Looks good to me. A few comments:

* is it necessary that section 7 *and* subsections 7.2 and 7.3 be marked 
as normative?

* the POWDER example in section 6 is (or should be, I think) related to 
the RDF ontology in section 7; shouldn't both sections be swapped?

   pa


On 01/19/2011 10:27 AM, Thierry MICHEL wrote:
>
> Pierre Antoine,
>
> i have added your
> input in section 7
>
> see
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#ont-RDF
>
> Let me know if it is OK.
>
> Thierry
>
>
>
> Le 14/01/2011 22:02, Pierre-Antoine Champin a écrit :
>> ben non, il en restait une :-(
>>
>> a+
>>
>> pa
>>
>

Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 10:09:55 UTC