W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > January 2011

Re: review of LC-2418 and Action Items to Wonsuk, Daniel and Joakim

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:12:23 +0100
Message-ID: <4D2CB9A7.7010109@w3.org>
To: Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>
CC: Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Clarification for substantial17:
  "it MAY also define a coordinate system that can be used to interpret
  these measurements" Is there a controlled vocabulary for these?
  Everywhere that there's something that looks like there could be one
  (e.g. whenever something has a "type" this should be indicated).

  → the statement in the spec is *changed*. DONE

Only the example of a geocoordinateis is *not added*

Thierry.


Le 11/01/2011 20:23, Thierry MICHEL a écrit :
>
>
> Per my action Item, I have done a review of LC-2418
>
>
> Items NOT implemented in the spec: (Must do)
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * ed3.:
> ------- You have a CSS rule that sets margin-{top,bottom} to 0.3em on li
> and p. This makes your document quite hard to read, I have to go tinker
> with it in Firebug in order to go through it. Please don't change some
> of the fundamental style rules from the basic W3C style.
> → NOT Done, still there:
> li, p { margin-top: 0.3em; margin-bottom: 0.3em; }
> I had asked Wonsuk to remove the CSS from the document and link to an
> external CSS page.
> See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Sep/0045.html
>
>
>
> --> ACTION WONSUK to change CSS.
>
>
>
> * substantial17:
> ----------------
> "it MAY also define a coordinate system that can be used to interpret
> these measurements" Is there a controlled vocabulary for these?
> Everywhere that there's something that looks like there could be one
> (e.g. whenever something has a "type" this should be indicated).
> → NOT done
> → the statement in the spec is *unchanged*.
> → the example of a geocoordinateis is *not added*
> Resolutuon was: [About ""it MAY also define a coordinate system that can
> be used to interpret these measurements" Is there a controlled
> vocabulary for these? ", we will give an example of a geocoordinate that
> can be used in this case and rephrase the sentence to avoid the
> confusion about "interpreting the measurements" in the next version of
> the document.]
>
> --> ACTION is for Daniel to write to the Geolocation WG for a suggestion.
>
>
>
> ed19.:
> -----
> In general it would be helpful if you could be clearer about what the
> normative statements apply to. What is it that MUST do this or that? Is
> it an abstract usage of an ontology? A concrete implementation?
> Something else?
>
> -->ACTION Joakim: Is this now more clear ?
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 20:12:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 20:12:51 GMT