W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > January 2011

review of LC-2418 and Action Items to Wonsuk, Daniel and Joakim

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:23:10 +0100
Message-ID: <4D2CAE1E.6010309@w3.org>
To: Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>, Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>


Per my action Item, I have done a review of LC-2418


Items NOT implemented in the spec: (Must do)
--------------------------------------------

* ed3.:
------- You have a CSS rule that sets margin-{top,bottom} to 0.3em on li
and p. This makes your document quite hard to read, I have to go tinker
with it in Firebug in order to go through it. Please don't change some
of the fundamental style rules from the basic W3C style.
→ NOT Done, still there:
li, p  { margin-top: 0.3em; margin-bottom: 0.3em; }
I had asked Wonsuk to remove the CSS from the document and link to an
external CSS page.
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Sep/0045.html


--> ACTION WONSUK to change CSS.



* substantial17:
----------------
"it MAY also define a coordinate system that can be used to interpret
these measurements" Is there a controlled vocabulary for these?
Everywhere that there's something that looks like there could be one
(e.g. whenever something has a "type" this should be indicated).
→ NOT done
→ the statement in the spec is *unchanged*.
→ the  example of a geocoordinateis is *not added*
Resolutuon was: [About ""it MAY also define a coordinate system that can
be used to interpret these measurements" Is there a controlled
vocabulary for these? ", we will give an example of a geocoordinate that
can be used in this case and rephrase the sentence to avoid the
confusion about "interpreting the measurements" in the next version of
the document.]

--> ACTION is for Daniel to write to the Geolocation WG for a suggestion.



ed19.:
-----
In general it would be helpful if you could be clearer about what the
normative statements apply to. What is it that MUST do this or that? Is
it an abstract usage of an ontology? A concrete implementation?
Something else?

-->ACTION Joakim: Is this now more clear ?
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 19:23:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 19:23:41 GMT