W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > December 2011

Re: WG: Issue regarding WebM ontology example

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 07:38:09 +0100
Message-ID: <4EFC0AD1.9020709@w3.org>
To: "Höffernig, Martin" <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Martin,

RDF file at
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/DougExample_webm.rdf

Best,

Thierry

Le 21/12/2011 12:24, Höffernig, Martin a écrit :
> Thierry,
>
> can you please update the attached example in the ontology testsuite!?
>
> Best,
> Martin
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Silvia Pfeiffer [mailto:silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2011 11:25
> An: Höffernig, Martin
> Cc: tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Betreff: Re: Issue regarding WebM ontology example
>
> Sure, that would be perfect.
> Thanks,
> Silvia.
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Höffernig, Martin<Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>  wrote:
>> Dear Silvia,
>>
>> I think the RDF/XML version has been mixed up with some other example and the Turtle version is correct. The RDF/XML example looks like some EBU-related format while in the Turtle version includes WebM-related properties.
>> Therefore I propose to generate a new RDF/XML version with respect to the existing Turtle version.
>>
>> The RDF/XML version according to the Turtle version is attached to this mail.
>> If you agree I would kindly ask Thierry to update RDF/XML version in the ontology testsuite.
>>
>> Best,
>> Martin
>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: Silvia Pfeiffer [mailto:silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com]
>>> Gesendet: Montag, 19. Dezember 2011 02:59
>>> An: Höffernig, Martin
>>> Cc: tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>> Betreff: Re: Issue regarding WebM ontology example
>>>
>>> What differences are you referring to?
>>> Feel free to fix whatever you see is wrong with it. I did the
>>> original file  to cover a WebM example as a favor to the group while
>>> I was a member and some things had to be twisted to pass the tools.
>>> The original may have more information that wasn't able to be encoded
>>> into turtle.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Silvia.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Höffernig, Martin
>>> <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>  wrote:
>>>> Dear  Silvia, Thierry,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> while looking at MA ontology examples in the testsuite, I found out
>>>> that the RDF version [1] and the Turtle version [2] of the WebM
>>>> example do not represent the same underlying RDF model. Maybe
>>>> something went wrong during the copying or editing process.
>>>>
>>>> Can you please address this issue!?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1]:
>>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/D
>>> o
>>>> ugExample_webm.rdf
>>>>
>>>> [2]:
>>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/D
>>> o
>>>> ugExample_webm.ttl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Martin Höffernig
>>>>
>>>> Audiovisual Media Group
>>>>
>>>> DIGITAL - Institute for Information and Communication Technologies
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Steyrergasse 17, 8010
>>>> Graz, AUSTRIA
>>>>
>>>> phone:  +43-316-876-1184
>>>>
>>>> general fax: +43-316-876-1191
>>>>
>>>> web:    http://www.joanneum.at/digital
>>>> e-mail: martin.hoeffernig@joanneum.at
>>>>
>>>>
Received on Thursday, 29 December 2011 06:38:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 December 2011 06:38:32 GMT