W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > December 2011

Re: AW: Issue regarding WebM ontology example

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 07:36:32 +0100
Message-ID: <4EFC0A70.9090900@w3.org>
To: "Höffernig, Martin" <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>
CC: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Martin,

RDF file at
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/DougExample_webm.rdf

Best,

Thierry

Le 21/12/2011 11:07, Höffernig, Martin a écrit :
> Dear Silvia,
>
> I think the RDF/XML version has been mixed up with some other example and the Turtle version is correct. The RDF/XML example looks like some EBU-related format while in the Turtle version includes WebM-related properties.
> Therefore I propose to generate a new RDF/XML version with respect to the existing Turtle version.
>
> The RDF/XML version according to the Turtle version is attached to this mail.
> If you agree I would kindly ask Thierry to update RDF/XML version in the ontology testsuite.
>
> Best,
> Martin
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Silvia Pfeiffer [mailto:silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com]
>> Gesendet: Montag, 19. Dezember 2011 02:59
>> An: Höffernig, Martin
>> Cc: tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Betreff: Re: Issue regarding WebM ontology example
>>
>> What differences are you referring to?
>> Feel free to fix whatever you see is wrong with it. I did the original
>> file  to cover a WebM example as a favor to the group while I was a
>> member and some things had to be twisted to pass the tools. The
>> original may have more information that wasn't able to be encoded into
>> turtle.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Silvia.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Höffernig, Martin
>> <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>  wrote:
>>> Dear  Silvia, Thierry,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> while looking at MA ontology examples in the testsuite, I found out
>>> that the RDF version [1] and the Turtle version [2] of the WebM
>>> example do not represent the same underlying RDF model. Maybe
>>> something went wrong during the copying or editing process.
>>>
>>> Can you please address this issue!?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/Do
>>> ugExample_webm.rdf
>>>
>>> [2]:
>>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/Do
>>> ugExample_webm.ttl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Martin Höffernig
>>>
>>> Audiovisual Media Group
>>>
>>> DIGITAL - Institute for Information and Communication Technologies
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Steyrergasse 17, 8010
>>> Graz, AUSTRIA
>>>
>>> phone:  +43-316-876-1184
>>>
>>> general fax: +43-316-876-1191
>>>
>>> web:    http://www.joanneum.at/digital
>>> e-mail: martin.hoeffernig@joanneum.at
>>>
>>>
Received on Thursday, 29 December 2011 06:37:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 December 2011 06:37:06 GMT