W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > December 2011

AW: Issue regarding WebM ontology example

From: Höffernig, Martin <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:02:57 +0100
To: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD9846F872C7874BB4E0FDF2A61EF09FD471FA0B1C@RZJC1EX.jr1.local>
Dear Thierry, all

I changed all URIs in the WebM example to absolute ones, since absolute URIs are required in the JSON test suite in order to retrieve reproduceable URIs.
Thierry, can you please update the attached example in the ontology testsuite!?

Best, 
Martin  

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Höffernig, Martin
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2011 12:24
> An: 'tmichel@w3.org'
> Cc: 'public-media-annotation@w3.org'
> Betreff: WG: Issue regarding WebM ontology example
> 
> Thierry,
> 
> can you please update the attached example in the ontology testsuite!?
> 
> Best,
> Martin
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Silvia Pfeiffer [mailto:silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2011 11:25
> An: Höffernig, Martin
> Cc: tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Betreff: Re: Issue regarding WebM ontology example
> 
> Sure, that would be perfect.
> Thanks,
> Silvia.
> 
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Höffernig, Martin
> <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at> wrote:
> > Dear Silvia,
> >
> > I think the RDF/XML version has been mixed up with some other example
> and the Turtle version is correct. The RDF/XML example looks like some
> EBU-related format while in the Turtle version includes WebM-related
> properties.
> > Therefore I propose to generate a new RDF/XML version with respect to
> the existing Turtle version.
> >
> > The RDF/XML version according to the Turtle version is attached to
> this mail.
> > If you agree I would kindly ask Thierry to update RDF/XML version in
> the ontology testsuite.
> >
> > Best,
> > Martin
> >
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: Silvia Pfeiffer [mailto:silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com]
> >> Gesendet: Montag, 19. Dezember 2011 02:59
> >> An: Höffernig, Martin
> >> Cc: tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> >> Betreff: Re: Issue regarding WebM ontology example
> >>
> >> What differences are you referring to?
> >> Feel free to fix whatever you see is wrong with it. I did the
> >> original file  to cover a WebM example as a favor to the group while
> >> I was a member and some things had to be twisted to pass the tools.
> >> The original may have more information that wasn't able to be
> encoded
> >> into turtle.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Silvia.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Höffernig, Martin
> >> <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at> wrote:
> >> > Dear  Silvia, Thierry,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > while looking at MA ontology examples in the testsuite, I found
> out
> >> > that the RDF version [1] and the Turtle version [2] of the WebM
> >> > example do not represent the same underlying RDF model. Maybe
> >> > something went wrong during the copying or editing process.
> >> >
> >> > Can you please address this issue!?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [1]:
> >> >
> >>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/D
> >> o
> >> > ugExample_webm.rdf
> >> >
> >> > [2]:
> >> >
> >>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/D
> >> o
> >> > ugExample_webm.ttl
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Best,
> >> >
> >> > Martin
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Martin Höffernig
> >> >
> >> > Audiovisual Media Group
> >> >
> >> > DIGITAL - Institute for Information and Communication Technologies
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Steyrergasse 17, 8010
> >> > Graz, AUSTRIA
> >> >
> >> > phone:  +43-316-876-1184
> >> >
> >> > general fax: +43-316-876-1191
> >> >
> >> > web:    http://www.joanneum.at/digital
> >> > e-mail: martin.hoeffernig@joanneum.at
> >> >
> >> >


Received on Thursday, 22 December 2011 10:03:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 22 December 2011 10:03:32 GMT