W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Issue regarding WebM ontology example

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:24:33 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2=4-m_3EkZKxphYMeAEM1XOWek5d3n=jZ8eEv=7NhPsdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Höffernig, Martin <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>
Cc: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Sure, that would be perfect.
Thanks,
Silvia.

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Höffernig, Martin
<Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at> wrote:
> Dear Silvia,
>
> I think the RDF/XML version has been mixed up with some other example and the Turtle version is correct. The RDF/XML example looks like some EBU-related format while in the Turtle version includes WebM-related properties.
> Therefore I propose to generate a new RDF/XML version with respect to the existing Turtle version.
>
> The RDF/XML version according to the Turtle version is attached to this mail.
> If you agree I would kindly ask Thierry to update RDF/XML version in the ontology testsuite.
>
> Best,
> Martin
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Silvia Pfeiffer [mailto:silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com]
>> Gesendet: Montag, 19. Dezember 2011 02:59
>> An: Höffernig, Martin
>> Cc: tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Betreff: Re: Issue regarding WebM ontology example
>>
>> What differences are you referring to?
>> Feel free to fix whatever you see is wrong with it. I did the original
>> file  to cover a WebM example as a favor to the group while I was a
>> member and some things had to be twisted to pass the tools. The
>> original may have more information that wasn't able to be encoded into
>> turtle.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Silvia.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Höffernig, Martin
>> <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at> wrote:
>> > Dear  Silvia, Thierry,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > while looking at MA ontology examples in the testsuite, I found out
>> > that the RDF version [1] and the Turtle version [2] of the WebM
>> > example do not represent the same underlying RDF model. Maybe
>> > something went wrong during the copying or editing process.
>> >
>> > Can you please address this issue!?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > [1]:
>> >
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/Do
>> > ugExample_webm.rdf
>> >
>> > [2]:
>> >
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/Do
>> > ugExample_webm.ttl
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Martin
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Martin Höffernig
>> >
>> > Audiovisual Media Group
>> >
>> > DIGITAL - Institute for Information and Communication Technologies
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Steyrergasse 17, 8010
>> > Graz, AUSTRIA
>> >
>> > phone:  +43-316-876-1184
>> >
>> > general fax: +43-316-876-1191
>> >
>> > web:    http://www.joanneum.at/digital
>> > e-mail: martin.hoeffernig@joanneum.at
>> >
>> >
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2011 10:25:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 December 2011 10:25:24 GMT