W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Issue regarding WebM ontology example

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:58:57 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2=pGq6t8jKxr=Shqs0T6592Ze69xMOqzwivZct03e47jA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Höffernig, Martin <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>
Cc: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
What differences are you referring to?
Feel free to fix whatever you see is wrong with it. I did the original
file  to cover a WebM example as a favor to the group while I was a
member and some things had to be twisted to pass the tools. The
original may have more information that wasn't able to be encoded into
turtle.

Cheers,
Silvia.

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Höffernig, Martin
<Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at> wrote:
> Dear  Silvia, Thierry,
>
>
>
> while looking at MA ontology examples in the testsuite, I found out that the
> RDF version [1] and the Turtle version [2] of the WebM example do not
> represent the same underlying RDF model. Maybe something went wrong during
> the copying or editing process.
>
> Can you please address this issue!?
>
>
>
> [1]:
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/DougExample_webm.rdf
>
> [2]:
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/DougExample_webm.ttl
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> --
>
> Martin Höffernig
>
> Audiovisual Media Group
>
> DIGITAL – Institute for Information and Communication Technologies
>
>
>
> JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
> Steyrergasse 17, 8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
>
> phone:  +43-316-876-1184
>
> general fax: +43-316-876-1191
>
> web:    http://www.joanneum.at/digital
> e-mail: martin.hoeffernig@joanneum.at
>
>
Received on Monday, 19 December 2011 01:59:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 19 December 2011 01:59:49 GMT