Re: Response to your LC Comment -2410 on Media API spec

> Please review it carefully and *let us know by email at public-media-annotation@w3.org if you agree with it or not*
before [09-Oct-2010].
Thanks, Agree.

Jo
On 29 Sep 2010, at 08:15, Thierry MICHEL wrote:

> Dear  Jo,
> 
> The Media Annotations Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the API for Media Resource 1.0 published on 08 June 2010.
> Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments.
> 
> The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.
> Please review it carefully and *let us know by email at public-media-annotation@w3.org if you agree with it or not*
> before [09-Oct-2010].
> In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group.
> If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will
> then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> For the Media Annotations Working Group,
> Thierry Michel,
> W3C Team Contact
> 
> 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Jul/0027.html
> 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-mediaont-api-1.0-20100608
> 
> Resolution of the MAWG:
> -----------------------
> 
> Good catch this parameter is indeed "NOT OPTIONAL".
> The MAWG agrees to your comment,
> Resolution: We will update the "getOriginalData" accordingly, in the next publication of the media API.

Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 09:28:11 UTC