W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > June 2010

Response to LC-2393

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:51:38 +0200
Message-ID: <4C23007A.7010006@w3.org>
To: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Hi,

Bellow is my draft response to LC-2393 comment.
I will wait for the WG to discuss it and for a resolution of the WG 
before sending it to the commenter.

Thierry

-------------------------------------






 From comments LC-2393
Subject: [LC Comment ONT]
To: jsalsman@talknicer.com
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org

Dear James,

The Media Annotations Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent 
[1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Ontology for Media 
Resource 1.0 published on 08 June 2010. Thank you for having taken the 
time to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at 
public-media-annotation@w3.org if you agree with it or not before [july 
11th 2010]. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a 
specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. 
If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the 
opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by 
the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in 
the W3C Recommendation Track.

Best,

For the Media Annotations Working Group,
Thierry Michel,
W3C Team Contact

1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Jun/0073.html
2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/

=====

Your comment on [API for Media Resource 1.0]

Ontology for Media Resource questions:

Why is speex not included?

Why is VP8 not included? Ref. http://www.webmproject.org and
http://www.webmproject.org/about/faq/#licensing

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
 >...
 > (8) Report of any Formal Objections....

I would like to formally object to the omission of an audio/x-speex
quality parameter from the API for Media Resource draft, and omission
of speex and vp8 from the Ontology for Media Resource draft.

Sincerely,
James Salsman
invited expert

___________________________________________________________


RESOLUTION of the Woryking Group:
---------------------------------

The mappings tables included in the Ontology specification are 
established from the Media Ontology's core properties to various 
multimedia metadata formats. This list of formats is not closed, nor 
does it pretend to be exhaustive. A future version of this specification 
MAY include additional mappings if a need or use case is established for 
these new mappings.

You will read this statement in the Ontology specification.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/#mapping-table

To focus on your request to include VP8 and speex in our Ontology, the 
mappings tables are intended for multimedia *metadata formats*.

- VP8 is an open video compression format (codedc).
- Speex is a free audio codec for Free Speech.

These are not *metadata formats*, and therefore not meant to be listed 
in our mapping table.

The working is open to addition of more metadata formats. If there are 
particular metadata formats that you would like to see included in this 
specification, please bring your expertise to the working group and we 
invite you to join the Media Annotations Working Group.
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 06:51:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 24 June 2010 06:51:46 GMT